Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current methods and advances in forecasting of wind power generation

Open access
Foley, Aoife M., Leahy, Paul G., Marvuglia, Antonino, McKeogh, Eamon J.·2012·Renewable Energy

Abstract

Wind power generation differs from conventional thermal generation due to the stochastic nature of wind. Thus wind power forecasting plays a key role in dealing with the challenges of balancing supply and demand in any electricity system, given the uncertainty associated with the wind farm power output. Accurate wind power forecasting reduces the need for additional balancing energy and reserve power to integrate wind power. Wind power forecasting tools enable better dispatch, scheduling and unit commitment of thermal generators, hydro plant and energy storage plant and more competitive market trading as wind power ramps up and down on the grid. This paper presents an in-depth review of the current methods and advances in wind power forecasting and prediction. Firstly, numerical wind prediction methods from global to local scales, ensemble forecasting, upscaling and downscaling processes are discussed. Next the statistical and machine learning approach methods are detailed. Then the techniques used for benchmarking and uncertainty analysis of forecasts are overviewed, and the performance of various approaches over different forecast time horizons is examined. Finally, current research activities, challenges and potential future developments are appraised.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.033

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2

    Skamarock, W., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D., & Wang, W. (2005) · NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · doi:10.5065/d6dz069t · Cited by 2,504 · cited 1×

    “Further examples include the freely downloadable MM5 regional model developed at the Pennsylvania State University and used by the National Center of Atmospheric Research in the United States of America (USA) and themore recent Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) regional model [14,15].”

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,317

Metadata

Authors
Foley, A. M., Leahy, P. G., Marvuglia, A., & McKeogh, E. J.
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984703120
Cited by
1,317
References
1
FWCI
36.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current methods and advances in forecasting of wind power generation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.033
The paper
Foley, A. M., Leahy, P. G., Marvuglia, A., & McKeogh, E. J. (2012). Current methods and advances in forecasting of wind power generation. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.