Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 48Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling and analysis of water droplet dynamics in the dead-ended anode gas channel for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Abstract

Abstract Proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells usually operate in dead-ended anode mode due to a comparatively simple system. Nevertheless, flooding in the anode channels in dead-ended mode is severe than that in flow-through configuration, which causes cell performance degradation and durability decrease. In this study, water droplet dynamics in the anode channel is investigated numerically using volume of fluid method to study water accumulation and drainage in the PEM fuel cell with the dead-ended anode. Simulations are divided into a dead-ended stage and a purge stage to study the two-phase flow behaviors. Impact of water accumulating volume is taken into consideration and, cases of different wettability of the gas diffusion layer surface and the bipolar plate surface are compared. The numerical results reveal that water droplets emerge from the water inlets and then accumulate and coalesce in the dead-ended stage. Most water droplets are drained out of the gas channel along the channel corners in the purge stage. It is found that larger water accumulating volume results in higher eliminating rate. The total purge time is mainly affected by the wettability of the bipolar plate surface.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.028

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ding, 2011, Three dimensional numerical simulation of gas–liquid two-phase flow patterns in a polymer–electrolyte membrane fuel cells gas flow channel, J. Power Sources, 196, 6284, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.100 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shao, H., Qiu, D., Peng, L., Yi, P., & Lai, X.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lai, Xinmin
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
138
Pages
842-851
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914176948
Cited by
48
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Renewable Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0103001)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51705308)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, dead-ended anode, water droplet dynamics, anode flooding, water drainage, two-phase flow, water accumulation, volume of fluid method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.