Production of biodiesel from waste shark liver oil for biofuel applications
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Waste shark liver oil (WSLO) is a non-edible feedstock that can be used for making biodiesel cost-effectively.
“Al Hatrooshi et al. [102] used waste shark liver oil (WSLO) for making biodiesel as cost effective as possible, which is also a non-edible feedstock.”
From Recent Developments in Lignocellulosic Biofuels, a Renewable Source of Bioenergy (2022) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Al Hatrooshi, A. S., Eze, V. C., & Harvey, A. P.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Eze, Valentine C.
- Venue
- Renewable Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 145
- Pages
- 99-105
- ISSN
- 0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2953555451
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Renewable Energy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- biodiesel, fatty acid methyl esters, transesterification, acid-catalyzed transesterification, base-catalyzed transesterification, free fatty acids, non-edible feedstock, biodiesel production cost, response surface methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
