The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternative production of methanol from industrial CO2
Abstract
Carbon dioxide valorization into value added products have become subject to much study to reduce industrial CO2 emissions and fossil energy resource consumption. In this context, the purpose of this study is to evaluate and highlight the interest of CO2 conversion into methanol through a complete techno-economic and environmental assessment of the entire process chain. The integrated process, successfully implemented in Aspen Plus®, is designed to treat the CO2 coming from a conventional cement plant. A MEA-based CO2 capture process is considered, and the captured CO2 is then directly sent to the conversion unit for its catalytic conversion. Consequently, combining the two units leads to relevant integrations, especially regarding the reuse of the heat provided by the exothermal methanol reactions for the regeneration of the CO2 capture solvent. An economic assessment is proposed to estimate the operational and investment costs, as well as the net present value, which demonstrates that the economic feasibility strongly depends on electricity and H2 production costs. A Life Cycle Analysis method is finally performed to identify the main environmental hotspots. The underlying process design offers a significant reduction in greenhouse gases (besides other categories) when compared to the conventional fossil production from natural gas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change
Mac Dowell, N., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N., & Maitland, G. C. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3231 · Cited by 1,321
The cost of CO2 capture and storage
Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E., & Herzog, H. J. (2015) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018 · Cited by 1,008
Cited by
Recent advances in carbon dioxide utilization
Zhang, Z., Pan, S.-Y., Li, H., Cai, J., Olabi, A. G., Anthony, E. J., & Manovic, V. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109799 · Cited by 732
Jang, D., Kim, J., Kim, D., Han, W.-B., & Kang, S. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115499 · Cited by 328
Lopez, G., Keiner, D., Fasihi, M., Koiranen, T., & Breyer, C. (2023) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee00478c · Cited by 284
Galán-Martín, Á., Tulus, V., Díaz, I., Pozo, C., Pérez-Ramírez, J., & Guillén-Gosálbez, G. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.001 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Meunier, N., Chauvy, R., Mouhoubi, S., Thomas, D., & De Weireld, G.
- Venue
- Renewable Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 146
- Pages
- 1192-1203
- ISSN
- 0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2955156970
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative production of methanol from industrial CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.010
- The paper
- Meunier, N., Chauvy, R., Mouhoubi, S., Thomas, D., & De Weireld, G. (2020). Alternative production of methanol from industrial CO2. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.