The cost of CO2 capture and storage
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At present, most mature CO2 removal technique for postcombustion streams is chemical absorption with aqueous amines.
“At the present time, and similarly to the case of natural gas processing, the most mature CO2 removal technique for postcombustion streams is chemical absorption with aqueous amines.5,527−529”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [529]
Integrated mineral carbonation within the mining industry has the potential to compete with geological storage methods.
“From an economic perspective, integrated mineral carbonation within the mining industry [122] has the potential to compete with geological storage methods [124].”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [124]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223 · see citing works
Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects
Fuss, S., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Hartmann, J., Khanna, T., et al. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f · Cited by 1,525 · see citing works
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change
Creutzig, F., Agoston, P., Goldschmidt, J. C., Luderer, G., Nemet, G., & Pietzcker, R. C. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 · Cited by 920 · see citing works
Hong, W. Y. (2022) · Carbon Capture Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100044 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
On the climate change mitigation potential of CO <sub>2</sub> conversion to fuels
Abanades, J. C., Rubin, E. S., Mazzotti, M., & Herzog, H. J. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02819a · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Self-citationGalán-Martín, Á., Tulus, V., Díaz, I., Pozo, C., Pérez-Ramírez, J., & Guillén-Gosálbez, G. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.001 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Siegelman, R. L., Milner, P. J., Kim, E. J., Weston, S. C., & Long, J. R. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee00505f · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Gunnarsson, I., Aradóttir, E. S., Oelkers, E. H., Clark, D. E., Arnarson, M. Þ., Sigfússon, B., Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. Ó., Matter, J. M., Stute, M., Júlíusson, B. M., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.08.014 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Tackling climate change with machine learning
Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., Ross, A. S., Milojevic-Dupont, N., Jaques, N., Waldman-Brown, A., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3485128 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review
Li, J., Hitch, M., Power, I., & Pan, Y. (2018) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min8040147 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“NGCC a Post-combustion Pipeline Geological storage 59–143 [124] SCPC b Post-combustion Pipeline Geological storage 46–99 [124] IGCC c Pre-combustion Pipeline Geological storage 38–84 [124] NGCC Post-combustion Pipeline EOR d 10–112 [124] SCPC Post-combustion Pipeline EOR (5)–58 [124] IGCC Pre-combustion Pipeline EOR (…”
BackgroundMethodPorter, R. T. J., Fairweather, M., Kolster, C., Mac Dowell, N., Shah, N., & Woolley, R. M. (2017) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.020 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The role of carbon capture and storage electricity in attaining 1.5 and 2 °C
Vinca, A., Rottoli, M., Marangoni, G., & Tavoni, M. (2018) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.020 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Pérez-Botella, E., Palomino, M., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2019) · Green Energy and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-3504-4_7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E., & Herzog, H. J.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (GB)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rubin, Edward S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 378-400
- ISSN
- 1750-5836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W763597904
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 117 · 2025: 125 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 54.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International journal of greenhouse gas control (publishedVersion)
- Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Keywords
- carbon capture and storage, CCS costs, post-combustion CO2 capture, natural gas combined cycle, pre-combustion capture, integrated gasification combined cycle, oxy-fuel combustion, levelized cost of electricity, capital costs, mitigation costs, power plant costs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
