Cited by 64Optimal Power Flow DistributionSmart Grid Energy ManagementPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques

A novel impact-assessment framework for distributed PV installations in low-voltage secondary networks

Sadeghian, Hamidreza, Wang, Zhifang·2020·Renewable Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.117

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sadeghian, H., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhifang
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
147
Pages
2179-2194
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975008628
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Keywords
distributed photovoltaic generation, low-voltage distribution networks, impact assessment, reverse power flow, voltage violation, voltage fluctuation, LiDAR, synthetic load profiles, multi-objective optimization, Monte Carlo simulation, photovoltaic penetration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review