CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 233Municipal Solid Waste ManagementHealthcare and Environmental Waste ManagementWaste Management and Environmental Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment

Khan, Imran, Kabir, Zobaidul·2020·Renewable Energy
DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.132
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.132

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Kühl, 2018, Implementation of circular economy principles in PSS operations, Procedia CIRP, 73, 124, 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.303 · DOI
  2. Khan, 2018, Importance of GHG emissions assessment in the electricity grid expansion towards a low-carbon future: a time-varying carbon intensity approach, J. Clean. Prod., 196, 1587, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.162 · DOI
  3. Khan, 2019, Drivers, enablers, and barriers to prosumerism in Bangladesh: a sustainable solution to energy poverty?, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 55, 82, 10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.019 · DOI
  4. dos Santos, 2019, Generating electrical energy through urban solid waste in Brazil : an economic and energy comparative analysis, J. Environ. Manag., 231, 198
  5. Laurent, 2014, Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems - Part I: lessons learned and perspectives, Waste Manag., 34, 573, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045 · DOI
  6. Geissdoerfer, 2017, The Circular Economy – a new sustainability paradigm?, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 757, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cartelle Barros, 2015, Assessing the global sustainability of different electricity generation systems, Energy, 89, 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.110 · DOI
  8. Desai, 2017, Sustainability in power generation systems, Encycl. Sustain. Technol., 1, 157, 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10045-4 · DOI
  9. Santoyo-castelazo, 2014, Sustainability assessment of energy systems : integrating environmental , economic and social aspects, J. Clean. Prod., 80, 119, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061 · DOI
  10. Milutinović, 2014, Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model, Energy, 74, 190, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.056 · DOI
  11. Antonopoulos, 2014, Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives considering sustainability criteria using the analytical hierarchical process tool, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 86, 149, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.002 · DOI
  12. Menikpura, 2012, Sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management in Sri Lanka: problems and prospects, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 14, 181, 10.1007/s10163-012-0055-z · DOI
  13. Evans, 2010, Sustainability considerations for electricity generation from biomass, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 14, 1419, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.010 · DOI
  14. Afgan, 2007, Biomass-fired power plant: the sustainability option, Int. J. Sustain. Energy, 26, 179, 10.1080/14786450701550434 · DOI
  15. Milutinovic, 2016, Sustainability assessment and comparison of waste management systems: the Cities of Sofia and Niš case studies, Waste Manag. Res., 34, 896, 10.1177/0734242X16654755 · DOI
  16. Li, 2015, Developing a sustainability assessment model to analyze China’s municipal solid waste management enhancement strategy, Sustainability, 7, 1116, 10.3390/su7021116 · DOI
  17. Goulart Coelho, 2018, Applying life cycle assessment to support environmentally sustainable waste management strategies in Brazil, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 128, 438, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.026 · DOI
  18. Liikanen, 2018, Steps towards more environmentally sustainable municipal solid waste management – a life cycle assessment study of São Paulo, Brazil, J. Clean. Prod., 196, 150, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.005 · DOI
  19. Jeswani, 2016, Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK, Waste Manag., 50, 346, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Erses Yay, 2015, Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya, J. Clean. Prod., 94, 284, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.089 · DOI
  21. Samolada, 2014, Comparative assessment of municipal sewage sludge incineration, gasification and pyrolysis for a sustainable sludge-to-energy management in Greece, Waste Manag., 34, 411, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Vandermeersch, 2014, Environ. Sustain. Assess. Food Waste Valorization Options, 87, 57
  23. Cherubini, 2009, Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration, Energy, 34, 2116, 10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.023 · DOI
  24. Chen, 2014, Sustainability assessment of solid waste management in China: a decoupling and decomposition analysis, Sustainability, 6, 9268, 10.3390/su6129268 · DOI
  25. Margallo, 2014, Environmental sustainability assessment in the process industry: a case study of waste-to-energy plants in Spain, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 93, 144, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.09.014 · DOI
  26. Lombardi, 2018, Evaluation of the environmental sustainability of different waste-to-energy plant configurations, Waste Manag., 73, 232, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.006 · DOI
  27. Khan, 2019, Power generation expansion plan and sustainability in a developing country: a multi-criteria decision analysis, J. Clean. Prod., 220, 707, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.161 · DOI
  28. Vučijak, 2016, Multicriteria decision making in selecting best solid waste management scenario: a municipal case study from Bosnia and Herzegovina, J. Clean. Prod., 130, 166, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.030 · DOI
  29. Aghajani, 2016, Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model, J. Environ. Manag., 166, 109
  30. Herva, 2013, Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives based on ecological footprint and multi-criteria analysis, Ecol. Indicat., 25, 77, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.005 · DOI
  31. Soltani, 2015, Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: a review, Waste Manag., 35, 318, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.010 · DOI
  32. Dong, 2018, Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies: theoretical analysis and case study of commercial plants, Sci. Total Environ., 626, 744, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.151 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Cucchiella, 2017, Sustainable waste management: waste to energy plant as an alternative to landfill, Energy Convers. Manag., 131, 18, 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.11.012 · DOI
  34. Moya, 2017, Municipal solid waste as a valuable renewable energy resource: a worldwide opportunity of energy recovery by using Waste-To-Energy Technologies, Energy Procedia, 134, 286, 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.618 · DOI
  35. Kumar, 2017, A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste, Waste Manag., 69, 407, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.046 · DOI
  36. Afgan, 2010, The knowledge society: a sustainability paradigm, CADMUS J., 1, 28
  37. Stringfellow, 2014, An independent engineering evaluation of waste-to-energy technologies, Renew. Energy World, 1
  38. Pauschert, 2009, Study of equipment prices in the power sector, ESMAP Tech. Pap., 121
  39. Arena, 2012, Process and technological aspects of municipal solid waste gasification, Rev. Waste Manag., 32, 625, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.025 · DOI
  40. Pirker, 2017, Sustainable power generation with large gas engines, Energy Convers. Manag., 149, 1048, 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.023 · DOI
  41. Chen, 2015, Reprint of: pyrolysis technologies for municipal solid waste: a review, Waste Manag., 37, 116, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.022 · DOI
  42. Dong, 2018, Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies: theoretical analysis and case study of commercial plants, Sci. Total Environ., 626, 744, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.151 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Zhou, 2018, Waste-to-energy: a review of life cycle assessment and its extension methods, Waste Manag. Res., 36, 3, 10.1177/0734242X17730137 · DOI
  44. Edwards, 1994, Improved Simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 60, 306, 10.1006/obhd.1994.1087 · DOI
  45. Wang, 2009, Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 13, 2263, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · DOI
  46. Campbell, 2003, Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care, Soc. Sci. Med., 56, 671, 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Zhang, 2015, Waste-to-energy in China: key challenges and opportunities, Energies, 8, 14182, 10.3390/en81212422 · DOI
  48. Dong, 2018, Comparison of waste-to-energy technologies of gasification and incineration using life cycle assessment: case studies in Finland, France and China, J. Clean. Prod., 203, 287, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.139 · DOI
  49. Ayodele, 2018, Economic and environmental assessment of electricity generation using biogas from organic fraction of municipal solid waste for the city of Ibadan, Nigeria, J. Clean. Prod., 203, 718, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.282 · DOI
  50. Guerrero, 2013, Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries, Waste Manag., 33, 220, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Standaert, 2017, As China pushes waste-to-energy incinerators, protests are mounting, Yale Environ., 360, 1
  52. Roberts, 2006, Waste incineration - how big is the health risk? A quantitative method to allow comparison with other health risks, J. Public Health, 28, 261
  53. Zaman, 2010, Comparative study of municipal solid waste treatment technologies, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 7, 225, 10.1007/BF03326132 · DOI
  54. Othman, 2013, Review on life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management in some Asian countries, J. Clean. Prod., 41, 251, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.043 · DOI
  55. Khan, 2020, Sustainability challenges for the south Asia growth quadrangle: a regional electricity generation sustainability assessment, J. Clean. Prod., 243, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118639 · DOI
  56. Kabir, 2020, Environmental impact assessment of waste to energy projects in developing countries: general guidelines in the context of Bangladesh, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess.
  57. Khan, 2019, Greenhouse gas emission accounting approaches in electricity generation systems: A review, Atmos. Environ., 200, 131, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Khan, I., & Kabir, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Khan, Imran
ORCID
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
150
Pages
320-333
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.132
OpenAlex
W2998018257
Cited by
233
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 18
FWCI
18.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Renewable Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Environmental Impact
Keywords
waste-to-energy, sustainability assessment, multi-criteria decision making, incineration, gasification, pyrolysis, anaerobic digestion, Sustainable Development Goals, circular economy, waste management, renewable electricity generation, developing countries, Bangladesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review