Cited by 8,550Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Industrial EcologyEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions

Open access
Kirchherr, Julian, Reike, Denise, Hekkert, Marko·2017·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

The circular economy concept has gained momentum both among scholars and practitioners. However, critics claim that it means many different things to different people. This paper provides further evidence for these critics. The aim of this paper is to create transparency regarding the current understandings of the circular economy concept. For this purpose, we have gathered 114 circular economy definitions which were coded on 17 dimensions. Our findings indicate that the circular economy is most frequently depicted as a combination of reduce, reuse and recycle activities, whereas it is oftentimes not highlighted that CE necessitates a systemic shift. We further find that the definitions show few explicit linkages of the circular economy concept to sustainable development. The main aim of the circular economy is considered to be economic prosperity, followed by environmental quality; its impact on social equity and future generations is barely mentioned. Furthermore, neither business models nor consumers are frequently outlined as enablers of the circular economy. We critically discuss the various circular economy conceptualizations throughout this paper. Overall, we hope to contribute via this study towards the coherence of the circular economy concept; we presume that significantly varying circular economy definitions may eventually result in the collapse of the concept.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CE seeks to enhance resource productivity by narrowing, slowing and closing material and energy loops.

    “CE seeks to enhance resource productivity by narrowing (enhancing efficiency), slowing them (extending use) and closing them (reclaiming resources) material and energy loops (Kirchherr et al. 2017;Konietzko et al. 2020).”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Kirchherr et al. 2017

    The paper’s definition in §2.3 (page not provided) describes CE through reducing, reusing, recycling and recovering materials, which broadly corresponds to using fewer resources, extending use and reclaiming resources. It does not state the specific narrowing–slowing–closing framework or describe enhancing resource productivity across both material and energy loops as CE’s aim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sustainable outcomes require business models in which the revenue logic rewards lifetime performance rather than volume-based turnover.

    “Sustainable outcomes require business models in which the revenue logic rewards lifetime performance rather than volume-based turnover (Kirchherr et al. 2017;Ferasso et al. 2020).”

    From Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones (2026) · cites this paper as Kirchherr et al. 2017

    Section 3.4 describes business models as an enabler of the circular economy and quotes a definition based on longevity. Section 2.3 links circular-economy business models to sustainable development. Neither passage says that revenue should reward lifetime performance rather than volume-based turnover; that specific requirement is unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There are over 100 definitions of circular economy.

    “There are over 100 definitions of circular economy (e.g., Bocken et al., 2016; Geissdoerfer et al., 2017; Gladek, 2017; Kirchherr et al., 2017; Korhonen et al., 2018; Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2019; Schöggl et al., 2020; Alhawari et al., 2021).”

    From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Kirchherr et al., 2017

    The Abstract says the authors gathered 114 circular-economy definitions. However, Section 3.1 (Sample overview) says those 114 entries comprise only 95 different definitions, so the source does not establish that there are over 100 distinct definitions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The limitations associated with the circular economy are primary emphases on economic and environmental gains while neglecting the social dimension to any significant extent.

    “On the other hand, the limitations associated with the circular economy are the primary emphases on economic and environmental gains while neglecting the social dimension to any significant extent (Kirchherr et al., 2017; D'Amato et al., 2018; Korhonen et al., 2018).”

    From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Kirchherr et al., 2017

  • The lack of theoretical robustness of the CE concept could lead organisations to appropriate the term without overhauling business practices in a meaningful way.

    “Perhaps, most problematically, the lack of theoretical robustness of the CE concept could lead organisations to appropriate the term without overhauling business practices in a meaningful way.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2012. Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Available at. https://www. ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur- Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf.
  2. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013b. Towards the circular economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 1 (1), 4-8.
  3. Fulton, S.C., 2012. Twenty years after the rio earth summit: what is the agenda for the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 91-94.
  4. RCR, 2017. Guide for Authors. Available at. https://www.elsevier.com/journals/ resources-conservation-and-recycling/0921-3449/guide-for-authors.
  5. Repo, P., Anttonen, M., 2017. Emerging consumer perspectives on circular economy. The 13th Nordic Environmental Social Science Conference HopefulNESS Available at. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317596538_Emerging_consumer_ perspectives_on_circular_economy.
  6. Science, 2017. Science Information for Authors. Available at. http://www.sciencemag. org/authors/science-information-authors.
  7. Taylor, S.J., 2016. A Review of Sustainable Development Principles. Available at. http:// mri.scnatweb.ch/en/afromontcontent/afromont-discussion-documents/2602- sustainable-development-review-2016/file.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Kirchherr, Julian
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
127
Pages
221-232
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756283300
Cited by
8,550
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 1694 · 2025: 1450 · 2024: 1189 · 2023: 1226 · 2022: 1056 · 2021: 901 · 2020: 577 · 2019: 315 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
558.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
circular economy, conceptualization, reduce, reuse, recycle, systemic change, sustainable development, economic prosperity, social equity, intergenerational equity, business models, consumer role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review