Cited by 104Pregnancy and Medication ImpactPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

The safety of calcium channel blockers during pregnancy: a prospective, multicenter, observational study

Weber-Schoendorfer, Corinna, Hannemann, Doreen, Meister, Reinhard, Eléfant, Elisabeth, Cuppers-Maarschalkerweerd, Benedikte, Arnon, Judy, Vial, Thierry, Rodriguez-Pinilla, Elvira +6 more·2008·Reproductive Toxicology

Abstract

Objective To assess the safety of calcium channel blockers during the first trimester of pregnancy.Study design A multicenter (n=11), prospective observational study of the European Network of Teratology Information Services (ENTIS). The rate of major birth defects was compared between a cohort of pregnant women exposed to calcium channel blockers during the first trimester (n=299) and a control group not exposed to potential teratogens (n=806).Results Major birth defects were not more common in the study group than in the control group. Birth weight was significantly lower in exposed term newborns. There were more preterm infants in the study group than in the control group (23.8% vs. 6.5%). These adverse effects are more likely due to the underlying disease than to the medication.Conclusion This study suggests that calcium channel blockers during the first trimester of pregnancy do not represent a major teratogenic risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.05.065

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weber-Schoendorfer, C., Hannemann, D., Meister, R., Eléfant, E., Cuppers-Maarschalkerweerd, B., Arnon, J., Vial, T., Rodriguez-Pinilla, E., Clementi, M., Robert-Gnansia, E., De Santis, M., Malm, H., Dolivo, A., & Schaefer, C.
Affiliations
  • Berliner Hochschule für Technik (DE)
  • Israel Ministry of Health (IL)
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Reproductive Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
24-30
ISSN
0890-6238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027351405
Cited by
104
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
calcium channel blockers, pregnancy, first trimester, teratogenicity, congenital malformations, birth weight, preterm birth, drug safety in pregnancy
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Abortion, Spontaneous, Adolescent, Adult, Birth Weight, Calcium Channel Blockers, Europe, Female, Humans, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Israel, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review