Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 566

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete

Open access
Chen, C., Habert, G., Bouzidi, Y., Jullien, A., Ventura, A.·2010·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Asif, 2007, Life cycle assessment: a case study of a dwelling home in Scotland, Build Environ, 42, 391, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.023 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ayer, 2007, Co-product allocation in life cycle assessments of seafood production systems: review of problems and strategies, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 12, 480, 10.1065/lca2006.11.284 · doi:10.1065/lca2006.11.284 · Paper page
  3. Babbitt, 2008, A life cycle comparison of disposal and beneficial use of coal combustion products in Florida. Part 1: methodology and inventory of materials, energy and emissions, Int J LCA, 13, 202, 10.1065/lca2007.07.353 · doi:10.1065/lca2007.07.353
  4. Basset-Mens, 2005, Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France, Agric Ecosyst Environ, 105, 127, 10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Benetto, 2004, Life cycle assessment of coal by-products based electric power production scenarios, Fuel, 83, 957, 10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00258-8 · DOI
  6. Bouhaya, 2009, Simplified environmental study on innovative bridge structure, Environ Sci Technol, 43, 2066, 10.1021/es801351g · DOI
  7. Chapman, 1974, Energy costs: a review of methods, Energy Policy, 2, 91, 10.1016/0301-4215(74)90002-0 · DOI
  8. Dahlström, 2006, Combining economic and environmental dimensions: value chain analysis of UK iron and steel flows, Ecol Econ, 58, 507, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.024 · DOI
  9. Ekvall, 2001, Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review, J Clean Prod, 9, 197, 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00052-4 · DOI · Paper page
  10. European Union, 2008, Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council on waste and repealing certain directives, Off J Eur Union, L312, 3
  11. Finnveden, 1999, Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems, Resour Conserv Recycl, 26, 173, 10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00005-1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Frichknecht, 2000, Allocation in Life Cycle Inventory Analysis for joint production, Int J LCA, 5, 85, 10.1007/BF02979729 · DOI
  13. Gartner, 2004, Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements, Cem Concr Res, 34, 1489, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Habert, 2009, Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives, Cem Concr Comp, 31, 397, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Heijungs, 2007, Allocation and ‘what if’ scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems, Waste Manage, 27, 997, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Heijungs, 1994, A generic method for the identification of options for cleaner products, Ecol Econ, 10, 69, 10.1016/0921-8009(94)90038-8 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hirst, 1974, Food-related energy requirements, Science, 184, 177, 10.1126/science.184.4133.134 · DOI
  18. Huijbregts, 2006, Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products?, Environ Sci Technol, 40, 641, 10.1021/es051689g · DOI · Paper page
  19. Jolliet, 2003, IMPACT 2002+: a new Life Cycle Impact Assessment methodology, Int J LCA, 8, 324, 10.1007/BF02978505 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kawai, 2005, Inventory data and case studies for environmental performance evaluation of concrete structure construction, J Adv Concr Technol, 3, 435, 10.3151/jact.3.435 · DOI
  21. Lee, 2005, Estimation of the environmental credit for the recycling of granulated blast furnace slag based on LCA, Res Cons Recycl, 44, 139, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.11.004 · DOI
  22. Metal Bulletin, 2008
  23. Osborne, 1999, Durability of Portland blast-furnace slag cement concrete, Cem Concr Comp, 21, 11, 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00032-8 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Reap, 2008, A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part I: goals and scope and inventory analysis, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 13, 290, 10.1007/s11367-008-0008-x · DOI · Paper page
  25. Reap, 2008, A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part II: impact assessment and interpretation, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 13, 374, 10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Sayagh, 2010, Sensitivity of the LCA allocation procedure for BFS recycled into pavement structures, Resour Conserv Recycl, 54, 348, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.011 · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.011
  27. Schuurmans, 2005, LCA of finer sand in concrete, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 10, 131, 10.1065/lca2004.04.154 · DOI
  28. Sisomphon, 2007, Carbonation rates of concretes containing high volume of pozzolanic materials, Cem Concr Res, 37, 1647, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Tillman, 1994, Choice of system boundaries in life cycle assessment, J Clean Prod, 2, 21, 10.1016/0959-6526(94)90021-3 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Weidema, 2001, Avoiding co-product allocation in life cycle assessment, J Ind Ecol, 4, 11, 10.1162/108819800300106366 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Xing, 2008, Inventory analysis of LCA on steel- and concrete-construction office buildings, Energy Buildings, 40, 1188, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.016 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Ziegler, 2003, Emisssions from fuel combustion in Swedish cod fishery, J Clean Prod, 11, 303, 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00050-1 · doi:10.1016/s0959-6526(02)00050-1

Cited by

See all 566

Metadata

Authors
Chen, C., Habert, G., Bouzidi, Y., Jullien, A., & Ventura, A.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
54
Issue
12
Pages
1231-1240
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001
OpenAlex
W2047878608
Cited by
566
References
2
FWCI
26.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001
The paper
Chen, C., Habert, G., Bouzidi, Y., Jullien, A., & Ventura, A. (2010). LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: An application to mineral additions in concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.