The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life cycle assessment of concrete made with high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash
Abstract
Abstract Since concrete is the most widely used construction material in the world, it is important to improve its environmental performance. A possibility is to use supplementary cementitious materials and recycled aggregates. Therefore, the objective of this work is to compare the environmental impacts (EI) of concrete mixes, which contain different incorporation ratios of fly ash (FA) and recycled concrete aggregates (RCA), with and without Superplasticizer (SP). The Life Cycle Assessment methodology was used for environmental assessment, according to ISO 14040 (2006) and EN 15804 (2012). Contrary to most of the previous studies, this one separately obtained the impact for each life cycle stage in detail (e.g. the impact of raw materials production, transportation, and mixing procedure), and explains the reason behind selecting each dataset. Thus, the results of this study can be used for other case studies. The results show that the EI slightly increased when SP was used. Moreover, the incorporation ratio of fine RCA did not change the results for most of the EI categories. Nevertheless, the EI of most of the categories decreased when coarse NA was fully replaced with coarse RCA. Despite the long transportation distance between the coal power plant and the concrete plant considered in the case study, the EI significantly decreased in most categories with increasing amounts of FA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework
(2013) · doi:10.3403/30151316 · Cited by 1,401
Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete
Marinković, S., Radonjanin, V., Malešev, M., & Ignjatović, I. (2010) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.04.012 · Cited by 818
Handbook on life cycle assessment — operational guide to the ISO standards
Guinée, J. (2001) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02978784 · Cited by 705
Chen, C., Habert, G., Bouzidi, Y., Jullien, A., & Ventura, A. (2010) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001 · Cited by 566
Kurad, R., Silvestre, J. D., de Brito, J., & Ahmed, H. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.236 · Cited by 357
Self-citationBraga, A. M., Silvestre, J. D., & de Brito, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.057 · Cited by 312
Self-citationTeixeira, E. R., Mateus, R., Camões, A. F., Bragança, L., & Branco, F. G. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.124 · Cited by 271
Coelho, A., & de Brito, J. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.024 · Cited by 256
Self-citationMulticriteria optimization of natural and recycled aggregate concrete for structural use
Tošić, N. D., Marinković, S. B., Dašić, T., & Stanić, M. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.070 · Cited by 243
Environmental assessment of green concretes for structural use
Marinković, S., Dragaš, J., Ignjatović, I., & Tošić, N. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.015 · Cited by 237
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fraile-Garcia, 2016, Optimization based on life cycle analysis for reinforced concrete structures with one-way slabs, Eng. Struct., 109, 126, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.001 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.001
- Fraile-Garcia, 2017, Repercussion the use phase in the life cycle assessment of structures in residential buildings using one-way slabs, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 191, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.130 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.130
Cited by
An overview of utilizing CO2 for accelerated carbonation treatment in the concrete industry
Li, L., & Wu, M. (2022) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102000 · Cited by 305
Goyal, H., Kumar, R., & Mondal, P. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136857 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurda, R., Silvestre, J. D., & de Brito, J.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 407-417
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2892300992
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 14.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- Funders
- CERIS unit from IST-University of Lisbon
- Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life cycle assessment of concrete made with high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.004
- The paper
- Kurda, R., Silvestre, J. D., & de Brito, J. (2018). Life cycle assessment of concrete made with high volume of recycled concrete aggregates and fly ash. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.