The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survey of officials’ awareness on circular economy development in China: Based on municipal and county level
Open accessAbstract
Abstract With rapid industrialization in China, both resource scarcity and resources efficiency have challenged the country's sustainable development. Under such circumstance, circular economy should be adopted as a national development strategy. However, due to a lack of understanding current barriers on implementing circular economy, it is necessary to conduct a questionnaire based survey. The data and information used in this paper were collected by distributing questionnaires in 6 cities and interviewing 252 respondents. Our research findings indicated that while most of officials working at municipal and county levels have higher awareness and understanding on circular economy concept and its significance, nearly 16.70% of the interviewed officials had just heard of circular economy indicating that there is still a need for government officials to further improve their circular economy awareness. Government officials can receive their circular economy knowledge through awareness raising activities thus obtaining higher circular economy awareness. The main barriers on circular economy development are weakness of public awareness and lack of financial support, the prior method on pushing circular economy development is to execute compulsory regulations, which is shared by about 61.11% of all respondents; the gap between policy-making and practical action is still a serious problem. Nearly half of the respondents are not willing to pay more money for green products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Huang, P., Zhang, X., & Deng, X. (2006) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.02.006 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · Cited by 3,328
Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · Cited by 2,762
Govindan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 · Cited by 1,522
Circular economy—From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools
Kalmykova, Y., Sadagopan, M., & Rosado, L. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034 · Cited by 1,412
Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers
Tura, N., Hanski, J., Ahola, T., Ståhle, M., Piiparinen, S., & Valkokari, P. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202 · Cited by 698
Metadata
- Authors
- Xue, B., Chen, X.-P., Geng, Y., Guo, X.-J., Lu, C.-P., Zhang, Z.-L., & Lu, C.-Y.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1296-1302
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131832382
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survey of officials’ awareness on circular economy development in China: Based on municipal and county level. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.05.010
- The paper
- Xue, B., Chen, X.-P., Geng, Y., Guo, X.-J., Lu, C.-P., Zhang, Z.-L., & Lu, C.-Y. (2010). Survey of officials’ awareness on circular economy development in China: Based on municipal and county level. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.05.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.