Cited by 1,412Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Industrial EcologySustainable Design and Development

Circular economy—From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools

Open access
Kalmykova, Yuliya, Sadagopan, Madumita, Rosado, Leonardo·2018·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

The paper provides an overview of the literature on Circular Economy (CE) theoretical approaches, strategies and implementation cases. After analyzing different CE approaches and the underlying principles the paper then proceeds with the main goal of developing tools for CE implementation. Two tools are presented. The first is a CE Strategies Database, which includes 45 CE strategies that are applicable to different parts of the value chain. The second is a CE Implementation Database, which includes over 100 case studies categorized by S cope , Parts of the Value Chain that are involved, as well as by the used Strategy and Implementation Level . An analysis of the state of the art in CE implementation is also included in the paper. One of the observations from the analysis is that while such Parts of the Value Chain as Recovery/Recycling and Consumption/Use are prominently featured, others, including Manufacturing and Distribution, are rarely involved in CE. On the other hand, the Implementation Levels of the used Strategies indicate that many market-ready solutions exist already. The Scope of current CE implementation considers selected products, materials and sectors, while system changes to economy are rarely suggested. Finally, the CE monitoring methods and suggestions for future development are also discussed in this paper. The analysis of the theoretical approaches can serve as an introduction to CE concept, while the developed tools can be instrumental for designing new CE cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalmykova, Y., Sadagopan, M., & Rosado, L.
Affiliations
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • University of Borås (SE)
Corresponding author
Kalmykova, Yuliya
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
135
Pages
190-201
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769398801
Cited by
1,412
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 185 · 2023: 210 · 2022: 222 · 2021: 220 · 2020: 164 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 28
FWCI
165.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
circular economy, circular economy strategies, value chain, recycling and recovery, implementation level, circular economy principles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review