The role of religious community in recycling: Empirical insights from Malaysia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent study showed the important role of religious communities for protecting the environment.
“Recent study showed the important role of religious communities for protecting the environment [30], supporting this conclusion.”
From Barriers to access improved water and sanitation in poor peri-urban settlements of Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire (2018) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Mohamad, Z. F., Idris, N., Baharuddin, A., Muhammad, A., & Nik Sulaiman, N. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Malaya (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Mohamad, Zeeda Fatimah
- Venue
- Resources Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 143-151
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112545507
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Keywords
- religious communities, recycling, municipal solid waste management, recycling programs, recycling motivation, religious organizations, Malaysia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
