CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 282Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Building Design and AssessmentSustainable Supply Chain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Waste effectiveness of the construction industry: Understanding the impediments and requisites for improvements

Open access
Ajayi, Saheed O., Oyedele, Lukumon O., Bilal, Muhammad, Akinade, Olugbenga O., Alaka, Hafiz A., Owolabi, Hakeem A., Kadiri, Kabir O.·2015·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of design for deconstruction (DfD) intervention at the design stage is a barrier to reuse of building components.

    “According to the literature, the lack of such an intervention is a barrier to reuse (Ajayi et al., 2015; Chileshe et al., 2015, 2016b; Dunant et al., 2017; Huuhka and Hakanen, 2015; Tatiya et al., 2017 (among others)).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Ajayi et al., 2015

  • Lack of confidence in the quality of reused components negatively affects reuse in new constructions.

    “Lack of confidence in the quality of the reused components negatively affects reuse in new constructions (Ajayi et al., 2015; Chileshe et al., 2015, 2016b, 2016a; Shaurette, 2006 (among others)).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Ajayi et al., 2015

    Section 2.2 (Materials Re-Use; page unavailable) describes uses for reclaimed construction materials but does not discuss confidence in their quality. Searches for “confidence,” “quality,” and “reused components” found no passage linking quality concerns to reduced reuse in new construction. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus

    Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/pdz9-th90 · Cited by 4,500 · cited 1×

    “The technique is a widely used and accepted method of enquiry that is used to achieve convergence of opinion from people within a domain of expertise (Hsu, 2007).”

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Akintoye, 1998, Risk analysis and management of private finance initiative projects, Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 5, 9, 10.1108/eb021056 · DOI
  2. Al-Hajj, 2011, Material waste in the UAE construction industry: main causes and minimization practices, Architect. Eng. Des. Manage., 7, 221
  3. Baek, 2013, Life cycle carbon dioxide assessment tool for buildings in the schematic design phase, Energy Build., 61, 275, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.01.025 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barros, 1998, A two-level network for recycling sand: a case study, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 110, 199, 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00093-9 · DOI
  5. Begum, 2006, A benefit–cost analysis on the economic feasibility of construction waste minimisation: the case of Malaysia, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 48, 86, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.01.004 · DOI
  6. Blengini, 2009, Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: a case study in Turin, Italy, Build. Environ., 44, 319, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.03.007 · DOI
  7. Browna, 2014, Better the devil you throw: experience and support for pay-as-you-throw waste charges, Environ. Sci. Policy, 38, 132, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.11.007 · DOI
  8. Corsten, 2013, The potential contribution of sustainable waste management to energy use and greenhouse gas emission reduction in The Netherlands, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 77, 13, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.002 · DOI
  9. Dahlén, 2010, Pay as you throw strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden, Waste Manage., 30, 23, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.022 · DOI
  10. Dalkey, 1963, An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts, Manage. Sci., 9, 458, 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dantata, 2005, An analysis of cost and duration for deconstruction and demolition of residential buildings in Massachusetts, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 44, 1, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Durana, 2006, A model for assessing the economic viability of construction and demolition waste recycling – the case of Ireland, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 46, 302, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.08.003 · DOI
  13. Durmus, 2011, Methodology of deconstruction in architectural education, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 15, 1586, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.335 · DOI
  14. Eadie, 2013, BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: an analysis, Autom. Constr., 36, 145, 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.001 · DOI
  15. Ekanayake, 2004, Building waste assessment score: design-based tool, Build. Environ., 39, 851, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.01.007 · DOI
  16. Enshassi, 2009, Delays and cost overruns in the construction projects in the Gaza strip, J. Financial Manage. Property Constr., 14, 126, 10.1108/13664380910977592 · DOI
  17. Faniran, 1998, Minimizing waste on construction project sites, Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 5, 182, 10.1108/eb021073 · DOI
  18. Formoso, 2002, Material waste in building industry: main causes and prevention, J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128, 316, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:4(316) · DOI
  19. Gao, 2001, Energy impacts of recycling disassembly materials in residential buildings, Energy Build., 33, 553, 10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00096-7 · DOI
  20. Hardie, 2007, The efficacy of waste management plans in Australian commercial construction refurbishment projects, Aust. J. Constr. Econ. Build., 7, 26
  21. Hodgson, 2011, Great expectations and hard times: the paradoxical experience of the engineer as project manager, Int. J. Project Manage., 29, 374, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.005 · DOI
  22. Jaillon, 2009, Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong, Waste Manage., 29, 309, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.015 · DOI
  23. Jasper, 1994, Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursing, J. Adv. Nursing, 19, 309, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01085.x · DOI
  24. Lu, 2013, Investigating waste reduction potential in the upstream processes of offshore prefabrication construction, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 28, 804, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.048 · DOI
  25. Manfredi, 2009, Landfilling of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions, Waste Manage. Res., 27, 825, 10.1177/0734242X09348529 · DOI
  26. Mcdonald, 1998, Implementing a waste management plan during the construction phase of a project: a case study, Constr. Manage. Econ., 16, 71, 10.1080/014461998372600 · DOI
  27. McGrath, 2001, Waste minimisation in practice, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 32, 227, 10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00063-5 · DOI
  28. Osmani, 2012, Construction waste minimization in the UK: current pressures for change and approaches, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 40, 37, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.158 · DOI
  29. Osmani, 2008, Architects’ perspectives on construction waste reduction by design, Waste Manage., 28, 1147, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.011 · DOI
  30. Oyedele, 2012, Avoiding performance failure payment deductions in PFI/PPP projects: model of critical success factors, J. Perform. Constr Facil., 27, 283, 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000367 · DOI
  31. Oyedele, 2014, Use of recycled products in UK construction industry: an empirical investigation into critical impediments and strategies for improvement, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 93, 23, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.09.011 · DOI
  32. Oyedele, 2013, Reducing waste to landfill in the UK: identifying impediments and critical solutions, World J. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev., 10, 131, 10.1108/20425941311323136 · DOI
  33. Peng, 1997, Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations, Constr. Manage. Econ., 15, 49, 10.1080/014461997373105 · DOI
  34. Poon, 2001, On-site sorting of construction and demolition waste in Hong Kong, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 32, 157, 10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00052-0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Read, 1997, Landfill as a future waste management option in England: the view of landfill operators, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 20, 183, 10.1016/S0921-3449(97)00017-7 · DOI
  36. Skumatz, 2008, Pay as you throw in the US: implementation, impacts, and experience, Waste Manage., 28, 2778, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.033 · DOI
  37. Solís-Guzmán, 2009, A Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste, Waste Manage., 29, 2542, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.009 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Tam, 2005, Use of prefabrication to minimize construction waste – a case study approach, Int. J. Constr. Manage., 5, 91
  39. Tam, 2008, On the effectiveness in implementing a waste-management-plan method in construction, Waste Manage., 28, 1072, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.007 · DOI
  40. Tam, 2007, Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction, Build. Environ., 42, 3642, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.003 · DOI
  41. Teo, 2001, A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry, Constr. Manage. Econ., 19, 741, 10.1080/01446190110067037 · DOI
  42. Treolar, 2003, An analysis of factors influencing waste minimisation and use of recycled materials for the construction of residential buildings, Manage. Environ. Qual. Int. J., 14, 134, 10.1108/14777830310460432 · DOI
  43. Wimpenny, 2000, Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference, J. Adv. Nursing, 31, 1485, 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01431.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. Yeheyis, 2013, An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 15, 81, 10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Yuan, 2013, Critical management measures contributing to construction waste management: evidence from construction projects in China, Project Manage. J., 44, 101, 10.1002/pmj.21349 · DOI
  46. Yuan, 2012, A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste, Waste Manage., 32, 521, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.006 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., & Kadiri, K. O.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • Obafemi Awolowo University (NG)
Corresponding author
Oyedele, Lukumon O.
ORCID
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
102
Pages
101-112
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.001
OpenAlex
W1175199023
Cited by
282
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
  • Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (submittedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
construction and demolition waste, construction waste management, waste reduction, landfill waste, end-of-pipe treatment, building information modeling, waste management costs, waste management regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review