The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials
Open accessAbstract
A key challenge for the waste management sector is to maximise resource efficiency whilst simultaneously reducing its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. For stakeholders to better understand the GHG impacts of their waste management activities and identify emissions reduction opportunities, they need to be able to quantify the GHG impacts of material recycling. Whilst previous studies have been undertaken to develop GHG emission factors (EF) for materials recycling, they are generally insufficient to support decision-making due to a lack of transparency or comprehensiveness in the range of materials considered. In this study, we present for the first time a comprehensive, scientifically robust, fully transparent, and clearly documented series of GHG EFs for the recycling of a wide range of source-segregated materials. EFs were derived from a series of partial life cycle assessments (LCA) performed as far as possible in accordance with the ISO 14040 standard. With the exceptions of soil, plasterboard, and paint, the recycling of source-segregated materials resulted in net GHG savings. The majority of calculated GHG EFs were within the range of data presented in the literature. The quality of secondary data used was assessed, with the results highlighting the dearth of high quality life cycle inventory (LCI) data on material reprocessing and primary production currently available. Overall, the results highlight the important contribution that effective source-segregated materials recycling can have in reducing the GHG impacts of waste management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plastic waste from recycling centres: characterisation and evaluation of plastic recyclability
Faraca, G., & Astrup, T. (2019) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.038 · Cited by 370
Abdollahi Saadatlu, E., Barzinpour, F., & Yaghoubi, S. (2022) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108127 · Cited by 52
Economic and climate impacts from the incorrect disposal of WEEE
Pekarkova, Z., Williams, I. D., Emery, L., & Bone, R. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105470 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, D. A., Williams, I. D., & Kemp, S.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 186-197
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2174945987
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.026
- The paper
- Turner, D. A., Williams, I. D., & Kemp, S. (2015). Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.