Economic and climate impacts from the incorrect disposal of WEEE
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the United Kingdom, the economic loss resulting from inappropriate WEEE disposal in residual waste bins is projected to reach GBP 215 million by 2030.
“In the United Kingdom, the economic loss resulting from inappropriate WEEE disposal in residual waste bins is projected to reach GBP 215 million by 2030 [42].”
From Unveiling Environmental Potential in Smartphone Repair Practices in Vientiane Capital, Laos (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China
Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., & Zhang, X. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.09.016 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
E-waste collection channels and household recycling behaviors in Taizhou of China
Chi, X., Wang, M. Y. L., & Reuter, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.056 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Islam, M. T., Abdullah, A. B., Shahir, S. A., Kalam, M. A., Masjuki, H. H., Shumon, R., & Rashid, M. H. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.111 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Pérez-Belis, V., Braulio-Gonzalo, M., Juan, P., & Bovea, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.143 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unveiling Environmental Potential in Smartphone Repair Practices in Vientiane Capital, Laos
Soudachanh, S., & Salhofer, S. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17020711 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pekarkova, Z., Williams, I. D., Emery, L., & Bone, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Southampton City Council (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Ian D.
- ORCID
- Williams, Ian D.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 168
- Pages
- 105470
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3126842541
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
- Keywords
- electronic waste, residual waste, carbon footprint, landfill emissions, e-waste recycling, reuse, incineration, critical metal recovery, public awareness, kerbside collection, resale value, public behavior, Southampton
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
