The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 · Cited by 6,341
Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
Rezaei, J. (2015) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009 · Cited by 4,333
Self-citationA framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030810882816 · Cited by 4,085
Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review
Srivastava, S. K. (2007) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x · Cited by 3,984
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4 · Cited by 2,659
Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000) · Applied Optimization · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6 · Cited by 2,394
Sustainable supply chains: An introduction
Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.012 · Cited by 1,746
Sustainable Operations Management
Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & VanWassenhove, L. N. (2005) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00235.x · Cited by 1,746
Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model
Rezaei, J. (2016) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001 · Cited by 1,720
Self-citationGenovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2017) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015 · Cited by 1,502
Cited by
Panda, T. K., Kumar, A., Jakhar, S., Luthra, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kazancoglu, I., & Nayak, S. S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575 · Cited by 456
Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Shaikh, M. A. A. (2018) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.020 · Cited by 422
Self-citationA supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology
Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., & Sarkis, J. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1518607 · Cited by 406
Self-citationAgyemang, M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Khan, S. A., Mani, V., Rehman, S. T., & Kusi-Sarpong, H. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-11-2018-1178 · Cited by 394
Self-citationAnalytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution
Tavana, M., Soltanifar, M., & Santos-Arteaga, F. J. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04432-2 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Badri Ahmadi, H., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 126
- Pages
- 99-106
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2741558154
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 99.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.020
- The paper
- Badri Ahmadi, H., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J. (2017). Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
