The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations
Open accessAbstract
So far, organizations had no authoritative guidance on circular economy (CE) principles, strategies, implementation, and monitoring. Consequentially, the British Standards Institution recently launched a new standard “BS 8001:2017 – Framework for implementing the principles of the circular economy in organizations”. BS 8001:2017 tries to reconcile the far-reaching ambitions of the CE with established business routines. The standard contains a comprehensive list of CE terms and definitions, a set of general CE principles, a flexible management framework for implementing CE strategies in organizations, and a detailed description of economic, environmental, design, marketing, and legal issues related to the CE. The guidance on monitoring CE strategy implementation, however, remains vague. The standard stipulates that organizations are solely responsible for choosing appropriate CE indicators. Its authors do not elaborate on the links between CE strategy monitoring and the relevant and already standardized quantitative tools life cycle assessment (LCA) and material flow cost accounting (MFCA). Here a general system definition for deriving CE indicators is proposed. Based on the system definition and the indicator literature a dashboard of new and established quantitative indicators for CE strategy assessment in organizations is then compiled. The dashboard indicators are mostly based on material flow analysis (MFA), MFCA, and LCA. Steel cycle data are used to illustrate potential core CE indicators, notably, the residence time of a material in the techno-sphere (currently 250–300 years for steel). Moreover, organizations need to monitor their contribution to in-use-stock growth, a central driver of resource depletion and hindrance to closing material cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · Cited by 9,360
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · Cited by 4,002
Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-0914 · Cited by 3,829
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · Cited by 3,328
Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · Cited by 2,762
Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review
Tukker, A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · Cited by 1,961
A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation
Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020 · Cited by 1,429
Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework
(2013) · doi:10.3403/30151316 · Cited by 1,401
The emergence of circular economy: a new framing around prolonging resource productivity
Blomsma, F., & Brennan, G. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12603 · Cited by 1,383
Cited by
A taxonomy of circular economy indicators
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., & Kendall, A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.014 · Cited by 1,093
Corona, B., Shen, L., Reike, D., Rosales Carreón, J., & Worrell, E. (2019) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498 · Cited by 987
Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice
Suárez-Eiroa, B., Fernández, E., Méndez-Martínez, G., & Soto-Oñate, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.271 · Cited by 688
Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Chiaroni, D., Del Vecchio, P., & Urbinati, A. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2466 · Cited by 672
López Ruiz, L. A., Roca Ramón, X., & Gassó Domingo, S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Pauliuk, S.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 129
- Pages
- 81-92
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2765304503
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 78.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019
- The paper
- Pauliuk, S. (2018). Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.