The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector – A review and an integrative model approach
Abstract
Abstract Construction and demolition waste (CDW) is a priority for many policies at global level. This is due to the high volume of CDW that is produced and its inadequate management. This situation leads to serious environmental effects, which are mainly associated with manufacturing processes for new building materials because of low product recovery rates. In this context, the concept of Circular Economy (CE) is a potential solution in many sectors, as it involves more efficient use of resources and energy, which leads to waste minimization and reduction of the environmental impacts of product cycles. Moreover, it represents potential economic opportunities. The main aim of this study was to identify factors that could influence the adoption of the Circular Economy concept in the construction and demolition sector. A systematic literature review was conducted to understand the main strategies involved in the development of integral circular strategies. The main contribution of this paper is a theoretical framework for the Circular Economy in the construction and demolition sector. The framework is comprised of 14 strategies within the five lifecycle stages of construction and demolition activities. Particularly, the framework emphasizes waste management and recirculation of recovered materials for their use as secondary building materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · Cited by 9,360
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · Cited by 4,002
Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · Cited by 2,762
Stahel, W. R. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/531435a · Cited by 2,555
Circular economy as an essentially contested concept
Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 · Cited by 1,568
A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation
Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020 · Cited by 1,429
How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review
Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · Cited by 1,358
Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055 · Cited by 1,169
Cited by
Circular economy in the building and construction sector: a scientific evolution analysis
Norouzi, M., Chàfer, M., Cabeza, L. F., Jiménez, L., & Boer, D. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704 · Cited by 482
Construction and built environment in circular economy: A comprehensive literature review
Çimen, Ö. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127180 · Cited by 269
Guerra, B. C., Shahi, S., Mollaei, A., Skaf, N., Weber, O., Leite, F., & Haas, C. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129125 · Cited by 196
Barriers to Implementing the Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Critical Review
Charef, R., Morel, J.-C., & Rakhshan, K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132312989 · Cited by 188
Rabbat, C., Awad, S., Villot, A., Rollet, D., & Andrès, Y. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111962 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- López Ruiz, L. A., Roca Ramón, X., & Gassó Domingo, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 248
- Pages
- 119238
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2984755814
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 29.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector – A review and an integrative model approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238
- The paper
- López Ruiz, L. A., Roca Ramón, X., & Gassó Domingo, S. (2020). The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector – A review and an integrative model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.