The DOI matches its Crossref record; 187 of the 187 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recovery of lithium and cobalt from spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) using organic acids as leaching reagents: A review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Environmental restrictions and economic benefits have obliged countries to promote recycling processes from secondary resources like spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) instead of using primary ones. In spite of the developments have been made on industrial scale for the technologies involved in recycling processes, most of these technologies suffer from lack of efficiency and echo-friendliness. To reduce the footprints of the recycling processes, several efforts are made. A major development area is the use of organic acids which are considered as promising agents for leaching of valuable metals from spent LIBs. In this review paper, we provided an overview of the recent status of the recycling technologies of spent LIBs using organic acids. For this purpose, necessity of green processes and advantage of organic acids in recycling of spent LIBs is discussed. To fully understand the effect of these agents, production, origin, application, and structure of organic acids that have been used in recovery of metals from spent LIBs are also addressed. Afterwards, recycling processes using organic acids, and benefits and drawbacks of using them are summarized and possible complexes formed by these agents are proposed. Eventually, development of different reducing agents, ultrasonic agitation, and evolution and future prospect of green processes in recycling of spent LIBs is reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levenspiel, O. (1999) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie990488g · Cited by 9,970
Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: a review
Etacheri, V., Marom, R., Elazari, R., Salitra, G., & Aurbach, D. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01598b · Cited by 6,726
A Literature Review of Poly(Lactic Acid)
Garlotta, D. (2001) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1023/a:1020200822435 · Cited by 3,707
Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals
(1970) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10928-2 · Cited by 3,699
Springer Science+Business Media
Технология (2013) · Betascript Publishing eBooks · Cited by 3,087
Electrodes with High Power and High Capacity for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
Kang, K., Meng, Y. S., Bréger, J., Grey, C. P., & Ceder, G. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1122152 · Cited by 2,638
Mn3O4−Graphene Hybrid as a High-Capacity Anode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries
Wang, H., Cui, L.-F., Yang, Y., Sanchez Casalongue, H., Robinson, J. T., Liang, Y., Cui, Y., & Dai, H. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja105296a · Cited by 1,948
Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals
(1980) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10929-4 · Cited by 1,791
Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling—an overview
Gupta, V. K., Ali, I., Saleh, T. A., Nayak, A., & Agarwal, S. (2012) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c2ra20340e · Cited by 1,613
Review on gel polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries
Manuel Stephan, A. (2006) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.09.017 · Cited by 1,422
Cited by
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Mossali, E., Picone, N., Gentilini, L., Rodrìguez, O., Pérez, J. M., & Colledani, M. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110500 · Cited by 574
Novel approaches for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines: A review
Liu, G., Zhao, Z., & Ghahreman, A. (2019) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.05.005 · Cited by 465
Recent progress on the recycling technology of Li-ion batteries
Wang, Y., An, N., Wen, L., Wang, L., Jiang, X., Hou, F., Yin, Y., & Liang, J. (2021) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2020.05.008 · Cited by 404
Recycling of lithium iron phosphate batteries: Status, technologies, challenges, and prospects
Wang, M., Liu, K., Dutta, S., Alessi, D. S., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112515 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Golmohammadzadeh, R., Faraji, F., & Rashchi, F.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 136
- Pages
- 418-435
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2806537302
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 187
- FWCI
- 20.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery of lithium and cobalt from spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) using organic acids as leaching reagents: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.024
- The paper
- Golmohammadzadeh, R., Faraji, F., & Rashchi, F. (2018). Recovery of lithium and cobalt from spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) using organic acids as leaching reagents: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
