Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of activated biochar addition on remediation efficiency of co-composting with contaminated wetland soil

Ye, Shujing, Zeng, Guangming, Wu, Haipeng, Liang, Jie, Zhang, Chang, Dai, Juan, Xiong, Weiping, Song, Biao, Wu, Shaohua, Yu, Jiangfang·2019·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

Abstract Unreasonable disposal of organic wastes has caused great problems, including occupying land, affecting organoleptic feeling and causing environmental re-contamination. By incorporation of biochar as raw material into co-composting with agricultural organic matter, it not only can the wastes recycling be realized, but also can the remediation efficiency of multi-element contaminated soil be improved to reach land reclamation. Activated biochar was added for investigating the influences on physico-chemical properties of soil during composting. The concentrations of available metals and arsenic in soil were detected on great reduction in the treatment of biochar-blended composting. Based on the stronger adsorption and microbial activity induced by biochar, the initial content of available PAHs in wetland soil decreased to remain about 3.03% and 5.47% below the control (9.47%) in co-composting added with activated and fresh biochar, respectively. It was related to the observation with improved microbial number as well as optimized fungi/bacteria gene copy number ratio by activated biochar addition, which is conducive to vegetation replanting of contaminated land. The feasibility of applying biochar into co-composting with contaminated soil was confirmed by not only the high remediation efficiency but also the sustainable recycling of agricultural waste.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.004

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Ye, S., Zeng, G., Wu, H., Liang, J., Zhang, C., Dai, J., Xiong, W., Song, B., Wu, S., & Yu, J.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
140
Pages
278-285
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897312312
Cited by
406
References
47
FWCI
60.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of activated biochar addition on remediation efficiency of co-composting with contaminated wetland soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.004
The paper
Ye, S., Zeng, G., Wu, H., Liang, J., Zhang, C., Dai, J., Xiong, W., Song, B., Wu, S., & Yu, J. (2019). The effects of activated biochar addition on remediation efficiency of co-composting with contaminated wetland soil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.