The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: A study in the textile industry
Abstract
Abstract The main objective of this paper is to balance social, environmental and economic criteria, alongside related ethical issues, in the supplier selection process when outsourcing activities in the textile industry. We propose a multi-criteria model to support supplier selection process, whereby suppliers are allocated to classes based on sustainability, integrating the opinions of customers and managers. The model has three phases: i) criteria definition, in which the Copeland method is used to aggregate criteria reported in the literature for a group of decision makers (customers and expert managers); ii) elicitation of the perceptions of decision-makers, about criteria and the definition of weights for these criteria using the AHP method, and iii) multi-criteria classification of suppliers performed using the ELECTRE-TRI method. A numerical application was performed in the textile sector in order to test results. The main results show that suppliers can be classified, balancing social, environmental and economic criteria and related ethical issues, considering opinions from customers and experts. The theoretical implications can benefit researchers who can apply the model in future research into economic, environmental and social interactions. Managers can use the structure presented in this model to improve supplier selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study
Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111119551 · Cited by 731
Delmonico, D., Jabbour, C. J. C., Pereira, S. C. F., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Renwick, D. W. S., & Thomé, A. M. T. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.033 · Cited by 158
Cited by
Govindan, K., Mina, H., Esmaeili, A., & Gholami-Zanjani, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Guarnieri, P., & Trojan, F.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 141
- Pages
- 347-361
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901122553
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: A study in the textile industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.023
- The paper
- Guarnieri, P., & Trojan, F. (2019). Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: A study in the textile industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.