Cited by 777Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study

Brammer, Stephen, Walker, Helen·2011·International Journal of Operations & Production Management

Abstract

Purpose Public bodies are being encouraged to procure sustainably, to reduce their social and environmental footprint and in order to stimulate sustainability in the private sector. However, little is known about how public sector organisations internationally are responding to this encouragement or of the conditions that are most conducive to sustainable procurement (SP). The purpose of this paper is to address these gaps in our knowledge so as to inform policy development at the government and organisational levels. Design/methodology/approach The authors report the findings of a survey of SP practices within a sample of over 280 public procurement practitioners from 20 countries and with collective responsibility for expenditure totalling $45bn p.a. Findings The authors' analysis shows that some SP practices are evident in public sector procurement practice and that the extent and nature of SP practices varies significantly across regions. In addition, the authors highlight the main facilitators of, and barriers to, engagement with SP and investigate their importance for engagement with particular dimensions of SP. Research limitations/implications Survey respondents are volunteers and may to some degree be more interested in, or engaged with, SP than other public sector organisations. The analysis is cross‐sectional and therefore provides only a snapshot of SP practice in the public sector organisations studied. Practical implications The paper identifies how policy and p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01443571111119551

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brammer, S., & Walker, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-03-22
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
452-476
ISSN
0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041478216
Cited by
731
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
62.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Operations & Production Management (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
sustainable procurement, public procurement, barriers and facilitators, sustainability policy implementation, cross-national comparison, environmental footprint, social sustainability, procurement policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review