Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How technological innovation impacts urban green economy efficiency in emerging economies: A case study of 278 Chinese cities

Liu, Yajie, Dong, Feng·2021·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

Abstract Clarifying the relationship and mechanism between technological innovation and the green economy efficiency (GEE) will improve the growth of the urban green economy for emerging economies. In the case of 278 Chinese prefecture cities, the data envelopment analysis game cross-efficiency model was used to measure the GEE between 2003 and 2017. In addition, the spatial econometric model was employed to explore the relationship and the transmission mechanism between technological innovation and the GEE from the perspectives of natural resources and urbanization. The heterogeneity of urban development was also brought into the analysis. The main results are as follows. (1) The GEE had positive spatial correlations. (2) Nationally, the intensive effect of technological innovation was significant and could considerably improve the GEE. (3) Due to the heterogeneity of urban development, there were large differences in the relationships and mechanisms between technological innovation and the GEE. Accordingly, that “unilateral” green economy construction efforts may not achieve ideal results. Therefore, neighboring cities should actively create green economy city cluster to achieve regionally common development. The eastern local governments could accelerate the transformation of the urban economy and promote the upgrading of green standards in industry through technological innovation. It is important for the central city governments to guide researchers to change the focus of their research, whereas the western region relies on attracting researchers to realize green economic development. Our results not only contribute to advancing the existing literature, but also are of considerable interest to policy makers and urban planners in emerging economies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105534

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Y., & Dong, F.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
169
Pages
105534
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139534736
Cited by
299
References
39
FWCI
41.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How technological innovation impacts urban green economy efficiency in emerging economies: A case study of 278 Chinese cities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105534
The paper
Liu, Y., & Dong, F. (2021). How technological innovation impacts urban green economy efficiency in emerging economies: A case study of 278 Chinese cities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105534

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.