The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Has China's Belt and Road Initiative promoted its green total factor productivity?——Evidence from primary provinces along the route
Abstract
Because nearly five years have passed since China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was implemented, there is an urgent need to explore whether it has significantly promoted provincial green economy development. Focusing on the primary provinces along its route, this study uses a GML index based on SBM directional distance function to evaluate provincial green total factor productivity (GTFP) and quantitatively analyses the BRI's net effect on provincial GTFP. The results indicate that provincial GTFP development is relatively good, with technological progress being its main driving force, there are significant differences between the regional GTFP development along the Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) and the Maritime Silk Road (MSR), and the BRI has played a significant role in promoting provincial and two regional GTFP. R&D investment inhibits provincial GTFP development while it is not significant. There is a U-shaped relationship between economic development and GTFP, a negative correlation between the current provincial economic level and GTFP. Trade between provinces and countries along the route has a negative effect on GTFP. To promote GTFP development, the provinces should value foreign trade, improve innovation mechanism, cultivate talents and actively embed in the BRI construction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901
Regression discontinuity designs in economics
Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.281 · Cited by 4,534
A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis
Tone, K. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00324-1 · Cited by 3,576
Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment.
Thistlethwaite, D. L., & Campbell, D. T. (1960) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044319 · Cited by 1,469
Cited by
Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Guo, X. (2019) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.016 · Cited by 580
Liu, Y., & Dong, F. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105534 · Cited by 299
Qiu, S., Wang, Z., & Geng, S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112282 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Z., & Xin, L.
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 129
- Pages
- 360-369
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2916313820
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 43.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Has China's Belt and Road Initiative promoted its green total factor productivity?——Evidence from primary provinces along the route. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.045
- The paper
- Liu, Z., & Xin, L. (2019). Has China's Belt and Road Initiative promoted its green total factor productivity?——Evidence from primary provinces along the route. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.