CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring business models for carbon emission reduction via post-consumer recycling infrastructures in Beijing: An agent-based modelling approach

Tong, Xin, Yu, Haofan, Han, Ling, Liu, Tao, Dong, Liang, Zisopoulos, Filippos, Steuer, Benjamin, de Jong, Martin·2023·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106666
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106666

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Abdel-Shafy, 2018, Solid waste issue: sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization, Egypt. J. Petrol., 27, 1275, 10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Beijing Bureau of Statistics, 2021. Beijing Statisic Yearbook China Statistics Press, Beijing.
  3. Botetzagias, 2015, Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: the role of moral norms and of demographic predictors, Resour., Conserv. Recycl, 95, 58, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004 · DOI
  4. Ceschi, 2021, Testing a norm-based policy for waste management: an agent-based modeling simulation on nudging recycling behavior, J. Environ. Manag., 294, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112938 · DOI
  5. Chao, 2008, Time series analysis of the effects of refuse collection on recycling: Taiwan's “Keep trash off the ground” measure, Waste Manag., 28, 859, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.012 · DOI
  6. Chen, 2021, Novel information interaction rule for municipal household waste classification behavior based on an evolving scale-free network, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 168, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105445 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2020, Physical and virtual carbon metabolism of global cities, Nat. Commun., 11, 182, 10.1038/s41467-019-13757-3 · DOI
  8. Chen, 2020, Carbon emissions under different domestic waste treatment modes induced by garbage classification: case study in pilot communities in Shanghai, China, Sci. Total Environ., 717, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137193 · DOI
  9. Cudjoe, 2021, Assessment of the potential energy and environmental benefits of solid waste recycling in China, J. Environ. Manag., 295, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113072 · DOI
  10. Derksen, 1993, The social context of recycling, Am. Sociol. Rev., 58, 434, 10.2307/2095910 · DOI
  11. Fontecha, 2022, Scientists wanted? A literature review on incentive programs that promote pro-environmental consumer behavior: energy, waste, and water, Socioecon. Plann. Sci., 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101251 · DOI
  12. Gielen, 1997, Potential CO2 emissions in The Netherlands due to carbon storage in materials and products, Ambio, 26, 101
  13. Glaeser, 2001, Consumer city, J. Econ. Geogr., 1, 27, 10.1093/jeg/1.1.27 · DOI
  14. Griskevicius, 2012, The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: implications for marketing, policy, and social entrepreneurship, J. Public Policy Mark., 31, 115, 10.1509/jppm.11.040 · DOI
  15. Gu, 2021, The recyclable waste recycling potential towards zero waste cities - a comparison of three cities in China, J. Clean. Prod., 295, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126358 · DOI
  16. Hansen, 2019, Agent-based modelling and socio-technical energy transitions: a systematic literature review, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 49, 41, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.021 · DOI
  17. Ioannou, 2013, Psychological determinants of household recycling intention in the context of the theory of planned behaviour, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 22, 2035
  18. Jian, 2019, Collaborative collection effort strategies based on the “Internet + recycling” business model, J. Clean. Prod., 241, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118120 · DOI
  19. Junot, 2018, Place attachment influence on human well-being and general pro-environmental behaviors, J. Theor. Soc. Psychol., 2, 49, 10.1002/jts5.18 · DOI
  20. Kuang, 2021, Public participation and city sustainability: evidence from urban garbage classification in China, Sustain. Cities Soc., 67, 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102741 · DOI
  21. Kurniawan, 2021, A societal transition of MSW management in Xiamen (China) toward a circular economy through integrated waste recycling and technological digitization, Environ. Pollut., 277, 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116741 · DOI
  22. Labelle, 2018, Agent-based model for end-of-life product flow analysis, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 7
  23. Liu, 2021, China's low-carbon governance at community level: a case study in Min'an community, Beijing, J. Clean. Prod., 311, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127530 · DOI
  24. Liu, 2019, Mechanisms of public education influencing waste classification willingness of urban residents, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 149, 381, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.001 · DOI
  25. Meng, 2019, Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents’ household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 140, 224, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.021 · DOI
  26. Nguyen, 2015, Factors influencing waste separation intention of residential households in a developing country: Evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam, Habitat International, 48, 169, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.013 · DOI
  27. Ohno, 2021, Detailing the economy-wide carbon emission reduction potential of post-consumer recycling, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 166, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105263 · DOI
  28. Pei, 2019, Roles of neighborhood ties, community attachment and local identity in residents’ household waste recycling intention, J. Clean. Prod., 241, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118217 · DOI
  29. Peng, 2021, Factor analysis and policy simulation of domestic waste classification behavior based on a multiagent study—taking Shanghai's garbage classification as an example, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 89, 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106598 · DOI
  30. Ramaswami, 2021, Carbon analytics for net-zero emissions sustainable cities, Nat. Sustain., 4, 460, 10.1038/s41893-021-00715-5 · DOI
  31. Shi, 2021, Investigating intention and behaviour towards sorting household waste in Chinese rural and urban–rural integration areas, J. Clean. Prod., 298, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126827 · DOI
  32. Sovacool, 2020, Culture and low-carbon energy transitions, Nat. Sustain., 3, 685, 10.1038/s41893-020-0519-4 · DOI
  33. Steuer, 2018, Can Beijing's informal waste recycling sector survive amidst worsening circumstances?, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 128, 59, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.026 · DOI
  34. Tian, 2019, Consumer's waste classification intention in China: an extended theory of planned behavior model, Sustainability, 11, 6999, 10.3390/su11246999 · DOI
  35. Tong, 2018, Behaviour change in post-consumer recycling: applying agent-based modelling in social experiment, J. Clean. Prod., 187, 1006, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.261 · DOI
  36. Tong, 2016, The rise and fall of a “waste city” in the construction of an “urban circular economic system”: the changing landscape of waste in Beijing, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 107, 10, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.003 · DOI
  37. Tong, 2018, Varieties of business models for post-consumer recycling in China, J. Clean. Prod., 170, 665, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.032 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Tong, 2021, Using weighted entropy to measure the recyclability of municipal solid waste in China: exploring the geographical disparity for circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 312, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127719 · DOI
  39. Tonglet, 2004, 41, 191
  40. Viscusi, 2011, Promoting recycling: private values, social norms, and economic incentives, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 65, 10.1257/aer.101.3.65 · DOI
  41. Walzberg, 2021, Role of the social factors in success of solar photovoltaic reuse and recycle programmes, Nat. Energy, 6, 913, 10.1038/s41560-021-00888-5 · DOI
  42. Walzberg, 2020, Do we need a new sustainability assessment method for the circular economy? A critical literature review, Front. Sustain
  43. Wan, 2021, The place-based approach to recycling intention: integrating place attachment into the extended theory of planned behavior, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 169, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105549 · DOI
  44. Wang, H., Han, H., Liu, T., Tian, X., Xu, M., Wu, Y., Gu, Y., Liu, Y., Zuo, T., 2018. Internet + recyclable resources: a new recycling mode in China. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 134, 44–47. · DOI
  45. Wang, 2021, What prevents us from taking low-carbon actions? A comprehensive review of influencing factors affecting low-carbon behaviors, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 71, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101844 · DOI
  46. Wang, 2022, Waste sorting in context: untangling the impacts of social capital and environmental norms, J. Clean. Prod., 330, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129937 · DOI
  47. Xiao, 2022, Low carbon potential of urban symbiosis under different municipal solid waste sorting modes based on a system dynamic method, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 179, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106108 · DOI
  48. Yang, 2022, Investigating the influencing factors of incentive-based household waste recycling using structural equation modelling, Waste Manag., 142, 120, 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Yuan, 2016, Model of Chinese household kitchen waste separation behavior: A case study in Beijing city, Sustainability-Basel, 8, 1083, 10.3390/su8101083 · DOI
  50. Yuriev, 2020, Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: a scoping review, Resour., Conserv. Recycl., 155, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660 · DOI
  51. Zhang, 2019, From intention to action: how do personal attitudes, facilities accessibility, and government stimulus matter for household waste sorting?, J. Environ. Manag., 233, 447, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.059 · DOI
  52. Zhang, 2021, Determinants affecting residents’ waste classification intention and behavior: a study based on TPB and A-B-C methodology, J. Environ. Manag., 290, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112591 · DOI
  53. Zhang, 2020, How important is community participation to eco-environmental conservation in protected areas? From the perspective of predicting locals' pro-environmental behaviours, Sci. Total Environ., 739, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139889 · DOI
  54. Zhou, 2021, Designing a smart incentive-based recycling system for household recyclable waste, Waste Manag., 123, 142, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.030 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Tong, X., Yu, H., Han, L., Liu, T., Dong, L., Zisopoulos, F., Steuer, B., & de Jong, M.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
188
Pages
106666
ISSN
0921-3449
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106666
Cited by
44
References
5
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (72061137071, 482.19.608)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review