Cited by 11Extraction and Separation ProcessesRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes

How can the water use of lithium brine mining be adequately assessed?

Schomberg, Anna C., Bringezu, Stefan·2023·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106806

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extended life cycle assessments that include brine, as well as ore in the scope of analysis, may reveal a more comprehensive water scarcity footprint of lithium-ion batteries, particularly when integrated with local hydrological cycles and downstream processing pathways.

    “Extended LCAs that do include brine, as well as ore in the scope of analysis, may reveal a more comprehensive water scarcity footprint of lithium-ion batteries, particularly when integrated with local hydrological cycles and downstream processing pathways”

    From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Schomberg & Bringezu, 2023

  • Increased lithium brine extraction has raised concerns about its potential impact on surrounding water bodies (e.g., local groundwater levels and lagoon surface areas).

    “Increased lithium brine extraction has raised concerns about its potential impact on surrounding water bodies (e.g., on local groundwater levels and lagoon surface areas) [19-22].”
  • There is a lack of consensus on the methodology for the assessment of brine in LCA.

    “These studies have used a variety of methods and approaches, most notably there is a lack of consensus on the methodology for the assessment of brine, also highlighted by Schomberg and Bringezu, 2023.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schomberg, A. C., & Bringezu, S.
Affiliations
University of Kassel (DE)
Corresponding author
Schomberg, Anna C.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
190
Pages
106806
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311086252
Cited by
11
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Keywords
water use assessment, water footprint, metal recycling, waste printed circuit boards, electrolysis, copper recovery, environmental impact comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review