Cited by 83Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiologyRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Sex differences in exertional dyspnea in patients with mild COPD: Physiological mechanisms

Guenette, Jordan A., Jensen, Dennis, Webb, Katherine A., Ofir, Dror, Raghavan, Natya, O’Donnell, Denis E.·2011·Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physiological basis for sex-differences in exercise-induced dyspnea in patients with mild COPD. We compared operating lung volumes, breathing pattern and dyspnea during incremental cycling in 32 men (FEV(1)=86±10% predicted) and women (FEV(1)=86±12% predicted) with mild COPD and 32 age-matched controls. There were no sex differences in dyspnea in the control group at any work-rate or ventilation (V(E)). Women with COPD had significantly greater dyspnea than men at 60 and 80 W. At 80 W, dyspnea ratings were 5.7±2.3 and 3.3±2.5 Borg units (P<0.05) and the V(E) to maximal ventilatory capacity ratio was 72% and 55% in women and men, respectively (P<0.05). Comparable increases in dynamic hyperinflation were seen in both male and female COPD groups at symptom limitation but women reached tidal volume constraints at a lower work rate and V(E) than men. Superimposing mild COPD on the normal aging effects had greater sensory consequences in women because of their naturally reduced ventilatory reserve.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resp.2011.04.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guenette, J. A., Jensen, D., Webb, K. A., Ofir, D., Raghavan, N., & O’Donnell, D. E.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
O’Donnell, Denis E.
Venue
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
177
Issue
3
Pages
218-227
ISSN
1569-9048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003627286
Cited by
83
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Queen&apos;s University
  • Kingston General Hospital
  • Department of Medicine, Georgetown University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
sex differences, exertional dyspnea, mild COPD, exercise-induced dyspnea, ventilatory reserve, dynamic hyperinflation, breathing pattern, incremental cycling, aging, ventilatory capacity
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Carbon Dioxide, Dyspnea, Exercise Test, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Predictive Value of Tests, Respiratory Function Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Tidal Volume, Exercise, Case-Control Studies, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review