The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 · Cited by 22,571
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159615 · Cited by 1,039
Cited by
Kwiek, M. (2021) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254 · Cited by 241
Active versus passive academic networking: Evidence from micro-level data
Goel, R. K., & Grimpe, C. (2013) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9236-5 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-305
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156551774
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
