CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,077

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change

Weber, K. Matthias, Rohracher, Harald·2012·Research Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Alkemade, 2011, Transition policy and innovation policy: friends or foes?, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 125, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.009 · DOI
  2. Almirall, 2011, Living labs: arbiters of mid- and ground-level innovation, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23, 87, 10.1080/09537325.2011.537110 · DOI
  3. Avelino, 2009, Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change, European Journal of Social Theory, 12, 543, 10.1177/1368431009349830 · DOI
  4. Azar, 2011, The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 135, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.003 · DOI
  5. Bergek, 2008, Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis, Research Policy, 37, 407, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bergek, 2008, ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 575, 10.1080/09537320802292768 · DOI
  7. Berkhout, 2006, Normative expectations in systems innovation, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, 299, 10.1080/09537320600777010 · DOI
  8. Carlsson, 1991, On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93, 10.1007/BF01224915 · DOI
  9. Coenen, 2012, Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions, Research Policy, 41, 968, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014 · DOI
  10. Dolata, 2009, Technological innovations and sectoral change: transformative capacity, adaptability, patterns of change: an analytical framework, Research Policy, 38, 1066, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.006 · DOI
  11. Edler, 2007, Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side, Research Policy, 36, 949, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003 · DOI
  12. Fogelberg, 2008, Understanding reflexive systems of innovation: an analysis of Swedish nanotechnology discourse and organization, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 65, 10.1080/09537320701726593 · DOI
  13. Garud, 2012, Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: evolutionary, relational and durational, Research Policy, 41, 980, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009 · DOI
  14. Geels, 2008, The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 521, 10.1080/09537320802292982 · DOI
  15. Genus, 2008, Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions, Research Policy, 37, 1436, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.006 · DOI
  16. Georghiou, 1998, Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy, vol. 22
  17. Hekkert, 2007, Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74, 413, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002 · DOI
  18. Hekkert, 2009, Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76, 584, 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013 · DOI
  19. Hendriks, 2007, Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9, 333, 10.1080/15239080701622790 · DOI
  20. Hillman, 2011, Fostering sustainable technologies: a framework for analysing the governance of innovation systems, Science and Public Policy, 38, 403, 10.3152/030234211X12960315267499 · DOI
  21. Jacobsson, 2011, Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: contributions and suggestions for research, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 41, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.006 · DOI
  22. Jaffe, 2005, A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy, Ecological Economics, 54, 164, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027 · DOI
  23. Jørgensen, 2012, Mapping and navigating transitions – the multi-level perspective compared with areas of development, Research Policy, 41, 996, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.001 · DOI
  24. Loorbach, 2010, The practice of transition management: examples and lessons from four distinct cases, Futures, 42, 237, 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009 · DOI
  25. Malerba, 2005, Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14, 63, 10.1080/1043859042000228688 · DOI
  26. Markard, 2008, Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework, Research Policy, 37, 596, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004 · DOI
  27. Meadowcroft, 2009, What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions, Policy Sciences, 42, 323, 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z · DOI
  28. Mowery, 2010, Technology policy and global warming: why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work), Research Policy, 39, 1011, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Nill, 2009, Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: from niche to paradigm?, Research Policy, 38, 668, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.011 · DOI
  30. Pavitt, 1984, Patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13, 343, 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0 · DOI
  31. Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 · DOI
  33. Schot, 1994, Strategies for shifting technological systems: the case of automobile system, Futures, 26, 1060, 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90073-6 · DOI
  34. Sharif, 2006, Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept, Research Policy, 35, 745, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001 · DOI
  35. Smith, 2007, Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19, 427, 10.1080/09537320701403334 · DOI
  36. Smith, 2012, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Research Policy, 41, 1025, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Smith, 2005, The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions, Research Policy, 34, 1491, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Smith, 2000, Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy, enterprise & innovation, Management Studies, 1, 73
  39. Walker, 2007, Ambivalence, sustainability and the governance of socio-technical transitions, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9, 213, 10.1080/15239080701622840 · DOI
  40. Woolthuis, 2005, A system failure framework for innovation policy design, Technovation, 25, 609, 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,077

Metadata

Authors
Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
1037-1047
ISSN
0048-7333
DOI
10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
Cited by
1,077
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
The paper
Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015