Cited by 141Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityAgglomeration and Urban SystemsRegional Economic Trends and Sectoral Structure

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Do low-skilled workers gain from high-tech employment growth? High-technology multipliers, employment and wages in Britain

Open access
Lee, Neil, Clarke, Stephen·2019·Research Policy

Abstract

Do low-skilled workers benefit from the growth of high-technology industries in their local economy? Policymakers invest considerable resources in attracting and developing innovative, high-tech industries, but there is relatively little evidence on the distribution of the benefits. This paper investigates the labour market impact of high-tech growth on low and mid-skilled workers, using data on UK local labour markets from 2009–2015. It shows that high-tech industries – either STEM-intensive ‘high-tech’ or digital economy – have a positive jobs multiplier, with each 10 new high-tech jobs creating around 7 local non-tradeable service jobs, around 6 of which go to low-skilled workers. Employment rates for mid-skilled workers do not increase, but they benefit from higher wages. Yet while low-skilled workers gain from higher employment rates, the jobs are often poorly paid service work, so average wages fall, particularly when increased housing costs are considered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Autor, 2013, The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market, Am. Econ. Rev., 103, 1553, 10.1257/aer.103.5.1553 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bakhshi, 2009, Creative supply-chain linkages and innovation: do the creative industries stimulate business innovation in the wider economy? Innovation: management, Policy and Practice, 11, 169, 10.5172/impp.11.2.169 · DOI
  3. Berry, 2016, The great British ‘rebalancing’ act: the construction and implementation of an economic imperative for exceptional times, Br. J. Polit. Int. Relat., 18, 3, 10.1111/1467-856X.12063 · DOI
  4. Breau, 2014, On the relationship between innovation and wage inequality: new evidence from Canadian cities, Econ. Geogr., 90, 351, 10.1111/ecge.12056 · DOI
  5. Brown, 2014, Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy, Technovation, 34, 773, 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.013 · DOI
  6. Donegan, 2008, Inequality in the creative city: is there still a place for ‘old-fashioned’ institutions?, Econ. Dev. Q., 22, 46, 10.1177/0891242407310722 · DOI
  7. Echeverri-Carroll, 2009, Wage differentials and the spatial concentration of high-technology industries, Pap. Reg. Sci., 88, 623, 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00199.x · DOI
  8. Echeverri-Carroll, 2018, Unintended consequences on gender diversity of high-tech growth and labor market polarization, Res. Policy, 47, 209, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.013 · DOI
  9. Faggio, 2014, The effect of public sector employment on local labour markets, J. Urban Econ., 79, 91, 10.1016/j.jue.2013.05.002 · DOI
  10. Fallah, 2014, Geography and high-tech employment growth in US counties, J. Econ. Geogr., 14, 683, 10.1093/jeg/lbt030 · DOI
  11. Foord, 2013, The new boomtown? Creative city to Tech City in east London, Cities, 33, 51, 10.1016/j.cities.2012.08.009 · DOI
  12. Gitell, 2014, Do entrepreneurship and high-tech concentration create jobs? Exploring the growth in employment in U.S. metropolitan areas from 1991 to 2007, Econ. Dev. Q., 28, 244, 10.1177/0891242414530467 · DOI
  13. Goetz, 2011, Sharing the gains of local economic growth: race-to-the-top versus race-to-the-bottom economic development, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 29, 428, 10.1068/c1077r · DOI
  14. Gordon, 1999, Targeting a leaky bucket, New Econ., 6, 199, 10.1111/1468-0041.00101 · DOI
  15. Green, 2017, Involuntary non-standard employment in Europe, Eur. Urban Reg. Stud., 24, 175, 10.1177/0969776415622257 · DOI
  16. Hecker, 2005, High-technology employment: a NAICS-based update, Mon. Labour Rev., 128, 57
  17. Isaksson, 2016, Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: evidence from the high-tech sectors, Res. Policy, 45, 699, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.12.007 · DOI
  18. Jaeger, 2018, Shift-share instruments and the impact of immigration (No. 24285), National Bureau of Economic Research
  19. Jarrell, 1996, Visionary or bureaucrat? T. H. Huxley, the science and art department and science teaching for the working class, Ann. Sci., 55, 219, 10.1080/00033799800200181 · DOI
  20. Kaplanis, 2010, Local human capital and its impact on local employment chances in Britain, Spatial Economics Research Centre Working Paper, 40
  21. Kaplanis, 2010, Wage effects from changes in local human capital in Britain, Spatial Economics Research Centre Working Paper, 39
  22. Kemeny, 2018, The wider impacts of high-technology employment: evidence from US cities, Res. Policy, 47, 1729, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.005 · DOI
  23. Kerry, 2016, Open innovation, triple Helix and regional innovation systems: exploring CATAPULT centres in the UK, Ind. High. Educ., 30, 67
  24. Lee, 2011, Are innovative regions more unequal? Evidence from Europe, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 29, 2, 10.1068/c1046r · DOI
  25. Lee, 2013, Innovation and spatial inequality in Europe and USA, J. Econ. Geogr., 13, 1, 10.1093/jeg/lbs022 · DOI
  26. Lee, 2016, Is there trickle-down from tech? Poverty, employment and the high-technology multiplier in US cities, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 106, 1114
  27. Lee, 2017, Powerhouse of cards? Understanding the ‘Northern Powerhouse’, Reg. Stud., 51, 478, 10.1080/00343404.2016.1196289 · DOI
  28. Mazzolari, 2013, Spillovers from high-skill consumption to low-skill labor markets, Rev. Econ. Stat., 95, 74, 10.1162/REST_a_00234 · DOI
  29. Moretti, 2010, Local multipliers, Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proceed., 100, 1
  30. Moretti, 2013, Local multipliers and human capital in the US and Sweden, Ind. Corp. Chang., 22, 339, 10.1093/icc/dts051 · DOI
  31. Nathan, 2014, Here be startups: exploring London’s ‘Tech city’ digital cluster, Environ. Plan. A, 46, 2283, 10.1068/a130255p · DOI
  32. North, 1955, Location theory and regional economic growth, J. Polit. Econ., 63, 243, 10.1086/257668 · DOI
  33. Salvatori, 2018, The anatomy of job polarisation in the UK, J. Labour Mark. Res., 52, 1
  34. Saxenian, 1983, The urban contradictions of Silicon Valley: regional growth and the restructuring of the semiconductor industry, Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., 7, 237, 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1983.tb00592.x · DOI
  35. Sissons, 2018, Linking the employment structure and household poverty in the United Kingdom, Work. Employ. Soc., 32, 1078, 10.1177/0950017017722939 · DOI
  36. Stilgoe, 2013, Developing a framework for responsible innovation, Res. Policy, 42, 1568, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Tiebout, 1956, A pure theory of local expenditures, J. Polit. Econ., 64, 415, 10.1086/257839 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Van Dijk, 2017, Local employment multipliers in U.S. Cities, J. Econ. Geogr., 17, 465
  39. Winters, 2014, STEM graduates, human capital externalities, and wages in the U.S, Reg. Sci. Urban Econ., 48, 190, 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.07.003 · DOI
  40. Youtie, 2008, Building an innovation hub: a case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development, Res. Policy, 37, 1188, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.012 · DOI
  41. Zehavi, 2017, Distribution sensitive innovation policies: conceptualisation and empirical examples, Res. Policy, 46, 327, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program

    Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789

    “But the empirical reality is less clear, with some research finding little to no connection between, for example, high-growth entrepreneurship and overall regional prosperity (Lee & Rodríguez-Pose, 2021 ; Lee & Clarke, 2019).”

Metadata

Authors
Lee, N., & Clarke, S.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Lee, Neil
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
103803
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948977440
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
13.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agglomeration and Urban Systems
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economic Trends and Sectoral Structure
Keywords
high-tech industry, low-skilled workers, digital economy, local labor markets, wages, employment rate, housing costs, service sector employment, regional economic development, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review