The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resource efficient eco-innovations for a circular economy: Evidence from EU firms
Abstract
Abstract Innovation adoption and diffusion by firms are key pillars for the EU strategy on resource efficiency and the development of a circular economy. This paper presents new EU evidence regarding the role of environmental policy and green demand drivers to sustain the adoption of resource efficiency-oriented eco-innovations. Using a large cross-section dataset of EU firms and accounting for sample selection and endogeneity, the results strongly support the idea that environmental policy and demand-side factors are both significant in driving the adoption of innovations that promote recycling, reduce waste and decrease the use of materials. The paper provides a relevant piece of new, quantitative-based knowledge, which complements the large case study-based evidence on sound management and policy strategies for the circular economy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2001) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 27,577
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · Cited by 9,360
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Towards a dynamic theory of strategy
Porter, M. E. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250121008 · Cited by 3,950
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · Cited by 3,328
The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041464498 · Cited by 3,107
Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study
Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465397557196 · Cited by 2,181
The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/res016 · Cited by 1,928
Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources
Horbach, J. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006 · Cited by 1,777
Cited by
Yuan, B., & Cao, X. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101868 · Cited by 531
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., Díaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495 · Cited by 459
D'Amato, D., & Korhonen, J. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143 · Cited by 438
Peng, H., Shen, N., Ying, H., & Wang, Q. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128044 · Cited by 412
Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Seuring, S., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jugend, D., De Camargo Fiorini, P., Latan, H., & Izeppi, W. C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Cainelli, G., D’Amato, A., & Mazzanti, M.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103827
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2977894039
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 42.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resource efficient eco-innovations for a circular economy: Evidence from EU firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103827
- The paper
- Cainelli, G., D’Amato, A., & Mazzanti, M. (2020). Resource efficient eco-innovations for a circular economy: Evidence from EU firms. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.