Meeting, mating, and intermediating: how incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each entrepreneurial ecosystem is a site of intellectual cross-pollination between the ecosystem's participants, who share knowledge through both informal and formal networks such as incubators and accelerators.
“Importantly, each EE is a site of intellectual cross-pollination between the ecosystem's participants, who share knowledge through both informal and formal networks such as incubators and accelerators (Bank et al., 2017;Eveleens et al., 2017;van Rijnsoever, 2020).”
From Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences (2021) · cites this paper as van Rijnsoever, 2020
Recent years have seen an increase in investigations that treat entrepreneurial ecosystems as important drivers of how entrepreneurship develops.
“While early studies of (sustainability) entrepreneurship frequently focused on different personal traits of startup founders (Davidsson and Wiklund, 2001;Harris et al., 2009;Zahra et al., 2009), recent years have seen an increase in investigations that treat entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) as important drivers of how entrepreneurship develops ( Acs et al., 2014;Alvedalen and Boschma, 2017;van Rij”
From Sustainability startups and where to find them: Investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences (2021) · cites this paper as van Rijnsoever, 2020
Cites
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245 · see citing works
Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity
Spinuzzi, C. (2012) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651912444070 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach
Theodoraki, C., Dana, L.-P., & Caputo, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.005 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127054 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- van Rijnsoever, F. J.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103884
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991605524
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 16
- FWCI
- 26.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dspace.library.uu.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- EIT Climate-KIC
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Keywords
- business incubators, entrepreneurial ecosystems, venture capital, technology transfer, innovation systems, field building, agent-based modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review