CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complementarity formation mechanisms in technology value chains

Mäkitie, Tuukka, Hanson, Jens, Steen, Markus, Hansen, Teis, Andersen, Allan Dahl·2022·Research Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104559
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104559

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Abernathy, 1985, Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction, Res. Policy, 14, 3, 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6 · DOI
  2. Andersen, 2014, No transition without transmission: HVDC electricity infrastructure as an enabler for renewable energy?, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 75, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.09.004 · DOI
  3. Andersen, 2020, Multi-technology interaction in socio-technical transitions: how recent dynamics in HVDC technology can inform transition theories, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 151, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119802 · DOI
  4. Bach, 2020, Implementing maritime battery-electric and hydrogen solutions: a technological innovation systems analysis, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 87, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102492 · DOI
  5. Bach, 2021, Blending new and old in sustainability transitions: technological alignment between fossil fuels and biofuels in Norwegian coastal shipping, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 74, 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101957 · DOI
  6. Bakker, 2014, Actor rationales in sustainability transitions – interests and expectations regarding electric vehicle recharging, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 60, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.08.002 · DOI
  7. Bennett, 2012, Using past transitions to inform scenarios for the future of renewable raw materials in the UK, Energy Policy, 50, 95, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.073 · DOI
  8. Bento, 2021, Inter-sectoral relations to accelerate the formation of technological innovation systems: determinants of actors’ entry into marine renewable energy technologies, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 173, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121136 · DOI
  9. Bergek, 2008, Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis, Res. Policy, 37, 407, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bergek, 2015, Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Binz, 2017, Global innovation systems—a conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts, Res. Policy, 46, 1284, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012 · DOI
  12. Bjerkan, 2021, Actors in energy transitions: transformative potentials at the intersection between Norwegian port and transport systems, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 72, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101868 · DOI
  13. Bugge, 2021, The role of regional innovation systems in mission-oriented innovation policy: exploring the problem-solution space in electrification of maritime transport, Eur. Plan. Stud.
  14. Dahmén, 1988, ‘Development blocks’ in industrial economics, Scand. Econ. Hist. Rev., 36, 3, 10.1080/03585522.1988.10408102 · DOI
  15. Damman, 2021, A socio-technical perspective on the scope for ports to enable energy transition, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 91, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102691 · DOI
  16. Das, 2000, Competing with new product technologies: a process model of strategy, Manag. Sci., 46, 1300, 10.1287/mnsc.46.10.1300.12276 · DOI
  17. Dolata, 2009, Technological innovations and sectoral change: transformative capacity, adaptability, patterns of change: an analytical framework, Res. Policy, 38, 1066, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.006 · DOI
  18. Eisenhardt, 1989, Building theories from case study research, Acad. Manag. Rev., 14, 532, 10.2307/258557 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Fitzgerald, 1998, Bessemer: the technology and the times, Interdiscip. Sci. Rev., 23, 362, 10.1179/isr.1998.23.4.362 · DOI
  20. Geels, 2018, Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration? A socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1990–2016), Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 46, 86, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.008 · DOI
  21. Gehman, 2018, Finding theory–method fit: a comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building, J. Manag. Inq., 27, 284, 10.1177/1056492617706029 · DOI
  22. Glaa, 2020, Identifying gaps and overlaps of intermediary support during the adoption of renewable energy technology in Sweden – a conceptual framework, J. Clean. Prod., 261, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121178 · DOI
  23. Haley, 2018, Integrating structural tensions into technological innovation systems analysis: application to the case of transmission interconnections and renewable electricity in Nova Scotia, Canada, Res. Policy, 47, 1147, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.004 · DOI
  24. Hanson, 2018, Established industries as foundations for emerging technological innovation systems: the case of solar photovoltaics in Norway, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 64, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.06.001 · DOI
  25. Hellsmark, 2020, A new dawn for (oil) incumbents within the bioeconomy? Trade-offs and lessons for policy, Energy Policy, 145, 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111763 · DOI
  26. Kim, 2019, Innovation towards sustainable technologies: a socio-technical perspective on accelerating transition to aviation biofuel, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 145, 317, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.002 · DOI
  27. Kivimaa, 2019, Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: a systematic review and a research agenda, Res. Policy, 48, 1062, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006 · DOI
  28. Konrad, 2008, Multi-regime dynamics in the analysis of sectoral transformation potentials: evidence from German utility sectors, J. Clean. Prod., 16, 1190, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kushnir, 2020, Adopting hydrogen direct reduction for the Swedish steel industry: a technological innovation system (TIS) study, J. Clean. Prod., 242, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118185 · DOI
  30. Leibowicz, 2018, Policy recommendations for a transition to sustainable mobility based on historical diffusion dynamics of transport systems, Energy Policy, 119, 357, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.066 · DOI
  31. Magnusson, 2018, Competing innovation systems and the need for redeployment in sustainability transitions, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 126, 217, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.08.014 · DOI
  32. Mäkitie, 2018, Established sectors expediting clean technology industries? The Norwegian oil and gas sector’s influence on offshore wind power, J. Clean. Prod., 177, 813, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.209 · DOI
  33. Mäkitie, 2022, Norwegian ship-owners’ adoption of alternative fuels, Energy Policy, 163, 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112869 · DOI
  34. Malerba, 2002, Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Res. Policy, 31, 247, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Malhotra, 2019, The role of inter-sectoral learning in knowledge development and diffusion: case studies on three clean energy technologies, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 146, 464, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.018 · DOI
  36. Markard, 2018, The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy, Nat. Energy, 3, 628, 10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7 · DOI
  37. Markard, 2016, Analysis of complementarities: framework and examples from the energy transition, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 111, 63, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.008 · DOI
  38. Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Res. Policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 · DOI
  39. Markard, 2020, Challenges in the acceleration of sustainability transitions, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9468 · DOI · Paper page
  40. McMeekin, 2019, Mapping the winds of whole system reconfiguration: Analysing low-carbon transformations across production, distribution and consumption in the UK electricity system (1990–2016), Res. Policy, 48, 1216, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.007 · DOI
  41. Musiolik, 2020, Creating innovation systems: how resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 153, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.002 · DOI
  42. Onufrey, 2015, Self-reinforcing mechanisms in a multi-technology industry: understanding sustained technological variety in a context of path dependency, Ind. Innov., 22, 523, 10.1080/13662716.2015.1100532 · DOI
  43. Pavitt, 1984, Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Res. Policy, 13, 343, 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0 · DOI
  44. Raven, 2007, Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: an assessment of differences and pitfalls, Energy Policy, 35, 2390, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.003 · DOI
  45. Robinson, 2012, Waiting games: innovation impasses in situations of high uncertainty, Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag., 24, 543, 10.1080/09537325.2012.693661 · DOI
  46. Rosenberg, 1969, The direction of technological change: inducement mechanisms and focusing devices, Econ. Dev. Cult. Chang., 18, 1, 10.1086/450399 · DOI
  47. Rosenbloom, 2020, Engaging with multi-system interactions in sustainability transitions: a comment on the transitions research agenda, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 336, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.003 · DOI
  48. Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Sandén, 2011, A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden, Res. Policy, 40, 403, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.005 · DOI
  50. Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag., 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 · DOI
  51. Sinsel, 2020, How deployment policies affect innovation in complementary technologies—evidence from the German energy transition, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 161, 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120274 · DOI
  52. Stephan, 2017, The sectoral configuration of technological innovation systems: patterns of knowledge development and diffusion in the lithium-ion battery technology in Japan, Res. Policy, 46, 709, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.009 · DOI
  53. Sutherland, 2015, Conceptualising multi-regime interactions: the role of the agriculture sector in renewable energy transitions, Res. Policy, 44, 1543, 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.013 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Suurs, 2009, Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: the case of biofuels in the Netherlands, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 76, 1003, 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.002 · DOI
  55. van Welie, 2018, Analysing transition pathways in developing cities: the case of Nairobi’s splintered sanitation regime, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 137, 259, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.059 · DOI · Paper page
  56. van Welie, 2019, Towards sustainable urban basic services in low-income countries: a technological innovation system analysis of sanitation value chains in Nairobi, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 196, 10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.002 · DOI
  57. Wirth, 2011, Context matters: how existing sectors and competing technologies affect the prospects of the Swiss Bio-SNG innovation system, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 78, 635, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 71

Metadata

Authors
Mäkitie, T., Hanson, J., Steen, M., Hansen, T., & Andersen, A. D.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
104559
ISSN
0048-7333
DOI
10.1016/j.respol.2022.104559
Cited by
71
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (268166, 295021, 296205)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review