Cited by 880Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisSystems Engineering Methodologies and ApplicationsSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering

Woods, David D.·2015·Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woods, D. D.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Woods, David D.
Venue
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
141
Pages
5-9
ISSN
0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977548549
Cited by
880
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 144 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
59.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Keywords
resilience engineering, robustness, brittleness, complex adaptive systems, network architecture, resilience definitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review