Cited by 63Occupational Health and Safety ResearchRisk and Safety AnalysisRisk Perception and Management

Escaping failures of foresight

Woods, D.D.·2009·Safety Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.030

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over-standardization can make a system brittle and less able to adapt to unexpected variation.

    “In routine situations anticipated by protocols, standardization can be of great benefit, but safety scientists contend that over-standardization can make a system brittle and less able to adapt to unexpected variation [89, 90].”

    From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [89]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woods, D. D.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Woods, D.D.
Venue
Safety Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
498-501
ISSN
0925-7535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094618066
Cited by
63
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Safety Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
foresight, accident prevention, risk anticipation, safety management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review