Cited by 48IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingComplex Network Analysis TechniquesInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis

Analysis on Cascading Reliability of Edge-Assisted Internet of Things

Fu, Xiuwen, Wang, Ye, Yang, Yongsheng, Postolache, Octavian·2022·Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108463

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, X., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Postolache, O.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
  • Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
  • Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
Corresponding author
Wang, Ye
Venue
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
223
Pages
108463
ISSN
0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220980249
Cited by
48
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 5
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Keywords
cascading failures, network reliability, data compression, link density, network isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review