Impact brain apnoea–a forgotten cause of cardiovascular collapse in trauma
Abstract
Objective Early death following cranial trauma is often considered unsurvivable traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, Impact Brain Apnoea (IBA), the phenomenon of apnoea following TBI, may be a significant and preventable contributor to death attributed to primary injury. This paper reviews the history of IBA, cites case examples and reports a survey of emergency responder experience. Methods Literature and narrative review and focused survey of pre-hospital physicians. Results IBA was first reported in the medical literature in 1705 but has been demonstrated in multiple animal studies and is frequently anecdotally witnessed in the pre-hospital arena following human TBI. It is characterised by the cessation of spontaneous breathing following a TBI and is commonly accompanied by a catecholamine surge witnessed as hypertension followed by cardiovascular collapse. This contradicts the belief that isolated traumatic brain injury cannot be the cause of shock, raising the possibility that brain injury may be misinterpreted and therefore mismanaged in patients with isolated brain injury. Current trauma management techniques (e.g. rolling patients supine, compression only cardiopulmonary resuscitation) could theoretically compound hypoxia and worsen the effects of IBA. Anecdotal examples from clinicians attending head injured patients within a few minutes of injury are described. Proposals for the study and intervention for IBA using advances in remote technology are discussed. Conc…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Impact brain apnea (IBA) from head trauma results in a primary respiratory arrest without significant parenchymal injury to the brain.
“IBA from head trauma results in a primary respiratory arrest without significant parenchymal injury to the brain.27”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wilson, M. H., Hinds, J., Grier, G., Burns, B., Carley, S., & Davies, G.
- Affiliations
- Royal London Hospital (GB)
- Craigavon Area Hospital (GB)
- Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Mark H
- Venue
- Resuscitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 52-58
- ISSN
- 0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2397086904
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, apnea, cardiovascular collapse, catecholamine surge, shock, prehospital care, first responders, patient positioning, hypoxia, early mortality
- MeSH terms
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Animals, Apnea, Heart Arrest, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review