Cited by 327Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in England

Open access
Hawkes, Claire, Booth, Scott, Ji, Chen, Brace-McDonnell, Samantha J., Whittington, Andrew, Mapstone, James, Cooke, Matthew W., Deakin, Charles D. +8 more·2017·Resuscitation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION This study reports the epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in England during 2014. METHODS Prospective observational study from the national OHCA registry. The incidence, demographic and outcomes of patients who were treated for an OHCA between 1st January 2014 and 31st December 2014 in 10 English ambulance service (EMS) regions, serving a population of almost 54 million, are reported in accordance with Utstein recommendations. RESULTS 28,729 OHCA cases of EMS treated cardiac arrests were reported (53 per 100,000 of resident population). The mean age was 68.6 (SD=19.6) years and 41.3% were female. Most (83%) occurred in a place of residence, 52.7% were witnessed by either the EMS or a bystander. In non-EMS witnessed cases, 55.2% received bystander CPR whilst public access defibrillation was used rarely (2.3%). Cardiac aetiology was the leading cause of cardiac arrest (60.9%). The initial rhythm was asystole in 42.4% of all cases and was shockable (VF or pVT) in 20.6%. Return of spontaneous circulation at hospital transfer was evident in 25.8% (n=6302) and survival to hospital discharge was 7.9%. CONCLUSION Cardiac arrest is an important cause of death in England. With less than one in ten patients surviving, there is scope to improve outcomes. Survival rates were highest amongst those who received bystander CPR and public access defibrillation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.10.030

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational data suggest that females and individuals from socially deprived and ethnic minority groups are less likely to receive bystander CPR and key post-arrest interventions.

    “Observational data suggest that females and individuals from socially deprived and ethnic minority groups are less likely to receive bystander CPR and key post-arrest interventions. 295,296”

    From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [295]

    The Results report overall bystander-CPR rates and the proportion of patients who were female, but do not compare CPR receipt by sex. Searches for female, ethnic-minority and social-deprivation differences in CPR or post-arrest interventions found no such comparison in our copy (section labels supplied without page numbers). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]17. Jacobs I, Nadkarni V. Update and Simplification of the Utstein Templates for Resuscitation Registries: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa). Circulation 2004;110:3385-97.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawkes, C., Booth, S., Ji, C., Brace-McDonnell, S. J., Whittington, A., Mapstone, J., Cooke, M. W., Deakin, C. D., Gale, C. P., Fothergill, R., Nolan, J. P., Rees, N., Soar, J., Siriwardena, A. N., Brown, T. P., & Perkins, G. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB)
  • Royal United Hospital (GB)
  • Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust (GB)
  • Southmead Hospital (GB)
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
Corresponding author
Perkins, Gavin D.
Venue
Resuscitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
110
Pages
133-140
ISSN
0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2555851332
Cited by
327
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
37.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • amber - ambulance research repository (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Intensive Care Foundation
  • Resuscitation Council (UK)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10139)
  • British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, incidence, bystander CPR, public access defibrillation, return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge, initial cardiac rhythm, asystole, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, ambulance services, England
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Demography, Emergency Medical Services, England, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Discharge, Prospective Studies, Registries, Incidence, Survival Rate, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Needs Assessment, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review