Cited by 74Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationParanormal Experiences and BeliefsPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

AWAreness during REsuscitation - II: A multi-center study of consciousness and awareness in cardiac arrest

Open access
Parnia, Sam, Keshavarz Shirazi, Tara, Patel, Jignesh, Tran, Linh, Sinha, Niraj, O'Neill, Caitlin, Roellke, Emma, Mengotto, Amanda +29 more·2023·Resuscitation

Abstract

Introduction Cognitive activity and awareness during cardiac arrest (CA) are reported but ill understood. This first of a kind study examined consciousness and its underlying electrocortical biomarkers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods In a prospective 25-site in-hospital study, we incorporated a) independent audiovisual testing of awareness, including explicit and implicit learning using a computer and headphones, with b) continuous real-time electroencephalography(EEG) and cerebral oxygenation(rSO 2) monitoring into CPR during in-hospital CA (IHCA). Survivors underwent interviews to examine for recall of awareness and cognitive experiences. A complementary cross-sectional community CA study provided added insights regarding survivors' experiences. Results Of 567 IHCA, 53(9.3%) survived, 28 of these (52.8%) completed interviews, and 11(39.3%) reported CA memories/perceptions suggestive of consciousness. Four categories of experiences emerged: 1) emergence from coma during CPR (CPR-induced consciousness [CPRIC]) 2/28(7.1%), or 2) in the post-resuscitation period 2/28(7.1%), 3) dream-like experiences 3/28(10.7%), 4) transcendent recalled experience of death (RED) 6/28(21.4%). In the cross-sectional arm, 126 community CA survivors' experiences reinforced these categories and identified another: delusions (misattribution of medical events). Low survival limited the ability to examine for implicit learning. Nobody identified the visual image, 1/28(3.5%) identified the auditory stimulus. Despite marked cerebral ischemia (Mean rSO 2 = 43%) normal EEG activity (delta, theta and alpha) consistent with consciousness emerged as long as 35-60 minutes into CPR. Conclusions Consciousness. awareness and cognitive processes may occur during CA. The emergence of normal EEG may reflect a resumption of a network-level of cognitive activity, and a biomarker of consciousness, lucidity and RED (authentic "near-death" experiences).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109903

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parnia, S., Keshavarz Shirazi, T., Patel, J., Tran, L., Sinha, N., O'Neill, C., Roellke, E., Mengotto, A., Findlay, S., McBrine, M., Spiegel, R., Tarpey, T., Huppert, E., Jaffe, I., Gonzales, A. M., Xu, J., Koopman, E., Perkins, G. D., Vuylsteke, A., Bloom, B. M., Jarman, H., Nam Tong, H., Chan, L., Lyaker, M., Thomas, M., Velchev, V., Cairns, C. B., Sharma, R., Kulstad, E., Scherer, E., O'Keeffe, T., Foroozesh, M., Abe, O., Ogedegbe, C., Girgis, A., Pradhan, D., & Deakin, C. D.
Affiliations
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Stony Brook University Hospital (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Royal Papworth Hospital (GB)
  • St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Medical University of Sofia (BG)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Carilion Clinic (US)
  • New York Hospital Queens (US)
  • Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine (US)
  • Kingston Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Parnia, Sam
Venue
Resuscitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
191
Pages
109903
ISSN
0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383532813
Cited by
74
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 6
FWCI
22.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, near-death experiences, cerebral oxygenation, EEG, delusions, implicit learning, cerebral ischemia
MeSH terms
Consciousness, Cross-Sectional Studies, Death, Heart Arrest, Humans, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review