AWAreness during REsuscitation - II: A multi-center study of consciousness and awareness in cardiac arrest
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Cognitive activity and awareness during cardiac arrest (CA) are reported but ill understood. This first of a kind study examined consciousness and its underlying electrocortical biomarkers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods In a prospective 25-site in-hospital study, we incorporated a) independent audiovisual testing of awareness, including explicit and implicit learning using a computer and headphones, with b) continuous real-time electroencephalography(EEG) and cerebral oxygenation(rSO 2) monitoring into CPR during in-hospital CA (IHCA). Survivors underwent interviews to examine for recall of awareness and cognitive experiences. A complementary cross-sectional community CA study provided added insights regarding survivors' experiences. Results Of 567 IHCA, 53(9.3%) survived, 28 of these (52.8%) completed interviews, and 11(39.3%) reported CA memories/perceptions suggestive of consciousness. Four categories of experiences emerged: 1) emergence from coma during CPR (CPR-induced consciousness [CPRIC]) 2/28(7.1%), or 2) in the post-resuscitation period 2/28(7.1%), 3) dream-like experiences 3/28(10.7%), 4) transcendent recalled experience of death (RED) 6/28(21.4%). In the cross-sectional arm, 126 community CA survivors' experiences reinforced these categories and identified another: delusions (misattribution of medical events). Low survival limited the ability to examine for implicit learning. Nobody identified the visual image, 1/28(3.5%) identified the auditory stimulus. Despite marked cerebral ischemia (Mean rSO 2 = 43%) normal EEG activity (delta, theta and alpha) consistent with consciousness emerged as long as 35-60 minutes into CPR. Conclusions Consciousness. awareness and cognitive processes may occur during CA. The emergence of normal EEG may reflect a resumption of a network-level of cognitive activity, and a biomarker of consciousness, lucidity and RED (authentic "near-death" experiences).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019) · SAGE Open Medicine · doi:10.1177/2050312118822927 · Cited by 1,869 · see citing works
The Near-Death Experience Scale: Construction, Reliability, and Validity
GREYSON, B. (1983) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198306000-00007 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Dualism persists in the science of mind
Demertzi, A., Liew, C., Ledoux, D., Bruno, M., Sharpe, M., Laureys, S., & Zeman, A. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04117.x · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Escolà-Gascón, Á., & Benito-León, J. (2025) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2025.04.025 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Parnia, S., Keshavarz Shirazi, T., Patel, J., Tran, L., Sinha, N., O'Neill, C., Roellke, E., Mengotto, A., Findlay, S., McBrine, M., Spiegel, R., Tarpey, T., Huppert, E., Jaffe, I., Gonzales, A. M., Xu, J., Koopman, E., Perkins, G. D., Vuylsteke, A., Bloom, B. M., Jarman, H., Nam Tong, H., Chan, L., Lyaker, M., Thomas, M., Velchev, V., Cairns, C. B., Sharma, R., Kulstad, E., Scherer, E., O'Keeffe, T., Foroozesh, M., Abe, O., Ogedegbe, C., Girgis, A., Pradhan, D., & Deakin, C. D.
- Affiliations
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Stony Brook University Hospital (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- Stony Brook University (US)
- New York University (US)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Royal Papworth Hospital (GB)
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Medical University of Sofia (BG)
- Drexel University (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Carilion Clinic (US)
- New York Hospital Queens (US)
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine (US)
- Kingston Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Parnia, Sam
- ORCID
- Venue
- Resuscitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 191
- Pages
- 109903
- ISSN
- 0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383532813
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 22.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, near-death experiences, cerebral oxygenation, EEG, delusions, implicit learning, cerebral ischemia
- MeSH terms
- Consciousness, Cross-Sectional Studies, Death, Heart Arrest, Humans, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review