Cited by 259Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild and Animal Learning Development

The effect of a parent-implemented imitation intervention on spontaneous imitation skills in young children with autism

Ingersoll, Brooke, Gergans, Samantha·2007·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Children with autism exhibit significant deficits in their ability to spontaneously imitate the play actions and descriptive gestures of others. Reciprocal imitation training (RIT) is a naturalistic imitation intervention designed to teach spontaneous imitation skills during play. This study assessed the effectiveness of parent-implemented RIT using a multiple-baseline design across three young children with autism and their mothers. After an initial baseline, mothers were taught to implement RIT techniques with their child twice a week for 10 weeks in a clinic setting. Two mothers were taught to use RIT to teach object imitation. The third mother was taught to use RIT to target both object and gesture imitation in a multiple-baseline design across behaviors. Generalization was assessed in the families' homes at the end of treatment and a 1-month follow-up. Parents learned to use the intervention strategies and their children exhibited increases in spontaneous imitation. These findings replicate the results from previous studies, indicating that RIT is effective for teaching imitation skills to young children with autism in a naturalistic setting and extend the findings to parents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.02.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 259

Authors
Ingersoll, B., & Gergans, S.
Affiliations
Lewis & Clark College (US)
Corresponding author
Ingersoll, Brooke
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
163-175
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969750774
Cited by
259
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, spontaneous imitation, parent-mediated intervention, gesture imitation, play, mothers, naturalistic intervention, generalization, young children
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Preschool, Communication, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Social Behavior, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review