Cited by 56Infant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

Prediction of participation and sensory modulation of late preterm infants at 12 months: A prospective study

Bart, O., Shayevits, S., Gabis, L.V., Morag, I.·2011·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

The aim of the study was to prospectively assess the differences in participation and sensory modulation between late preterm infants (LPI) and term babies, and to predict it by LPI characteristics. The study population includes 124 late preterm infants at gestational age between 34 and 35 6/7 weeks who were born at the same medical center. The control group comprised of 33 term babies (18 boys, 15 girls), born during the same period and location (mean age 12.47, SD = 0.73). Sensory modulation was assessed by the test of sensory functions in infants and the infant/toddler sensory profile and for assessment of participation and parents' satisfaction we used questionnaires. Term infants had better sensory modulation than LPI. Approximately 10% of the sensory modulation of participants in the study was explained by gestational age and head circumference. LPI participation and parental satisfaction decreased in the LPI group. Among all the explanatory variables only multiple gestations and head circumference contributed to the explained variance of participation (16%), and parents' satisfaction (13%). At age of 1 year, children born as late preterm are at increased risk of developing sensory modulation disorder, showing less participation, and resulting in less parental satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.037

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In preterm and late preterm infants, sensory differences range from modest to substantial when assessed by behavioral questionnaires or interactive sensory exams.

    “Sensory differences in preterm and late preterm (34–36 weeks of gestation) infants have been found to be modest to substantial, measured through both behavioral questionnaires and interactive sensory exams [11–13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bart, O., Shayevits, S., Gabis, L. V., & Morag, I.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital (IL)
  • Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Bart, O.
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
2732-2738
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005529322
Cited by
56
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Keywords
late preterm infants, sensory modulation, participation, sensory modulation disorder, parental satisfaction, head circumference, multiple pregnancy, gestational age, term infants, infant development
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, Child Development, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gestational Age, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Parents, Patient Participation, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sensation Disorders, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review