Cited by 74Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesChild Abuse and Trauma

Social relationship difficulties in autism and reactive attachment disorder: Improving diagnostic validity through structured assessment

Open access
Davidson, Claire, O’Hare, Anne, Mactaggart, Fiona, Green, Jonathan, Young, David, Gillberg, Christopher, Minnis, Helen·2015·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Background Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) versus Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) is a common diagnostic challenge for clinicians due to overlapping difficulties with social relationships. RAD is associated with neglect or maltreatment whereas ASD is not: accurate differential diagnosis is therefore critical. Very little research has investigated the relationship between the two, and it is unknown if standardised measures are able to discriminate between ASD and RAD. The current study aimed to address these issues. Methods Fifty eight children with ASD, and no history of maltreatment, were group matched on age with 67 children with RAD. Group profiles on multi-informant measures of RAD were investigated and group differences explored. Discriminant function analysis determined assessment features that best discriminated between the two groups. Results Although, according to parent report, children with ASD presented with significantly fewer indiscriminate friendliness behaviours compared to the RAD group (p<0.001), 36 children with ASD appeared to meet core RAD criteria. However, structured observation clearly demonstrated that features were indicative of ASD and not RAD for all but 1 of these 36 children. Conclusions Children with RAD and children with ASD may demonstrate similar social relationship difficulties but there appears to be a difference in the social quality of the interactions between the groups. In most cases it was possible to differentiate between children with ASD and children with RAD via structured observation. Nevertheless, for a small proportion of children with ASD, particularly those whose difficulties may be more subtle, our current standardised measures, including structured observation, may not be effective in differentiating RAD from ASD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.007

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A lack of inhibition in both social and non-social situations has been reported in children diagnosed with ASD.

    “This lack of inhibition in both social and non-social situations has been reported in children diagnosed with ASD (Davidson et al. 2015; Mayes et al. 2017).”

    From Neurexin1α knockout in rats causes aberrant social behaviour: relevance for autism and schizophrenia (2025) · cites this paper as Davidson et al. 2015

    The Discussion (page not indicated) reports that some children with ASD appeared to have disinhibited social symptoms, although most showed few observed signs of indiscriminate friendliness. The paper addresses social behaviour but does not report a lack of inhibition in non-social situations. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Official Action (2005). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with reactive attachment disorder in infancy and early childhood. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,44,1206-19.
  2. Angold A, Prendergast M, Cox A, Harrington R, Simonoff E and Rutter M. (1995) The Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment Psychological Medicine, 25 (4),739-753.
  3. Atkinson L (1992). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 26, 272
  4. Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook E.H jr, Leventhal B.L, DiLavore P.C, Pickles A and Rutter M (2000) The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic: A Standard Measure of Social and Communication Deficits Associated with the Spectrum of Autism Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30 (3), 205-223
  5. McLaughlin A, Espie C, and Minnis H (2010). Development of a brief, clinically useful, waiting room observation for Reactive Attachment Disorder behaviours. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 15 (2), 73-79
  6. Minnis H, Reekie J, Young D, O'Connor T, Ronald A, Gray A et al (2007). Genetic, environmental and gender influences on attachment disorder behaviours. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190 (6), 490-495
  7. Minnis H, Green J, O'Connor T.G, Liew A, Glaser D, Taylor E, Follan M, Young D et al (2009). An exploratory study of the association between reactive attachment disorder and narrative attachments in early school age children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(8), 931-942
  8. Moran H (2010). Clinical Observations of the differences between children on the autism spectrum and those with attachment problems: the Coventry Grid. Good Autism Practice, 11(2), 46-51
  9. Pritchett R, Pritchett J, Marshall E, Davidson C and Minnis H (2013). Reactive Attachment Disorder in the general population: A hidden ESSENCE Disorder. The Scientific World Journal: 6 pages Psychological Corporation (1999). Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence: manual. San Antonio (TX), Harcourt Brace.
  10. Rutter, M. (2005), Aetiology of autism: findings and questions. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49: 231-238
  11. Rutter M, Kreppner J, Croft C, Murin M, Colvert E, Beckett C et al (2007). Early adolescent outcomes of institutionally deprived and non-deprived adoptees. III. Quasi-autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 1200-1207.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, C., O’Hare, A., Mactaggart, F., Green, J., Young, D., Gillberg, C., & Minnis, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • National Health Service Scotland (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
Davidson, Claire
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
40
Pages
63-72
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036418942
Cited by
74
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, reactive attachment disorder, differential diagnosis, structured observation, multi-informant assessment, diagnostic validity, children
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Social Behavior, Reproducibility of Results, Discriminant Analysis, Reactive Attachment Disorder, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review