Cited by 4Children's Physical and Motor DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyLanguage Development and Disorders

The Toddler Language and Motor Questionnaire: A mother-report measure of language and motor development

Gudmundsson, Einar·2015·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

This study empirically evaluates the psychometric properties of a new mother-answered developmental instrument for toddlers, the Toddler Language and Motor Questionnaire (TLMQ). Mothers of 1132 15- to 38-month-old children filled out a 144-item instrument, tapping the toddlers' competences in five language and motor subtests. Concurrent validity was investigated in an independent sample by administering the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities (MSCA) individually to 47 children and the TLMQ to their mothers. A two-factor solution emerged in principal axis factor analyses with a promax rotation, with motor subtests loading high on one of the factors and the language subtests on the other. Toddlers' genders significantly affected outcome on all of the five subtests. Divergent and convergent correlations emerged between the TLMQ's motor composite and scales of the MSCA. Partially convergent and divergent correlations emerged between the TLMQ's language composite and scales of the MSCA. The findings show that young children's motor and language development can be reliably and validly assessed by using a psychometrically constructed questionnaire completed by mothers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.007

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Questionnaires proposed to parents were found reliable and valid instruments as a first step to assess motor and language development in Icelandic toddlers aged 15 to 38 months.

    “The questionnaires proposed to the children’s parents were found reliable and valid instruments as a first step to assess: (a) motor and language development in the ages ranging from 15 to 38 months in Icelandic toddlers [95]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gudmundsson, E.
Affiliations
University of Iceland (IS)
Corresponding author
Gudmundsson, Einar
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
45-46
Pages
21-31
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W945496136
Cited by
4
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
toddler language development, psychometric properties, concurrent validity, McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities, gender differences in development, factor structure
MeSH terms
Child Development, Child, Preschool, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Language Development Disorders, Male, Mothers, Motor Skills, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Motor Skills Disorders, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review