CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 304Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 159 of the 159 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing motor performance, praxis, coordination, and interpersonal synchrony between children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Open access
Kaur, Maninderjit, M. Srinivasan, Sudha, N. Bhat, Anjana·2018·Research in Developmental Disabilities
DOI 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.10.025PMC PMC5743591
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have basic motor impairments in balance, gait, and coordination as well as autism-specific impairments in praxis/motor planning and interpersonal synchrony. Majority of the current literature focuses on isolated motor behaviors or domains. Additionally, the relationship between cognition, symptom severity, and motor performance in ASD is unclear. We used a comprehensive set of measures to compare gross and fine motor, praxis/imitation, motor coordination, and interpersonal synchrony skills across three groups of children between 5 and 12 years of age: children with ASD with high IQ (HASD), children with ASD with low IQ (LASD), and typically developing (TD) children. We used the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and the Bilateral Motor Coordination subtest of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests to assess motor performance and praxis skills respectively. Children were also examined while performing simple and complex rhythmic upper and lower limb actions on their own (solo context) and with a social partner (social context). Both ASD groups had lower gross and fine motor scores, greater praxis errors in total and within various error types, lower movement rates, greater movement variability, and weaker interpersonal synchrony compared to the TD group. In addition, the LASD group had lower gross motor scores and greater mirroring errors compared to the HASD group. Overall, a variety of motor impairments are present across the entire spectrum of children with ASD, regardless of their IQ scores. Both, fine and gross motor performance significantly correlated with IQ but not with autism severity; however, praxis errors (mainly, total, overflow, and rhythmicity) strongly correlated with autism severity and not IQ. Our study findings highlight the need for clinicians and therapists to include motor evaluations and interventions in the standard-of-care of children with ASD and for the broader autism community to recognize dyspraxia as an integral part of the definition of ASD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.10.025

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 158 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 303

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kaur, M., M. Srinivasan, S., & N. Bhat, A.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
ORCID
Kaur, Maninderjit
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
72
Pages
79-95
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ridd.2017.10.025
PMC
PMC5743591
OpenAlex
W2768032362
Cited by
304
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R33MH089441, R21MH089441)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104941)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, motor performance, praxis, motor coordination, interpersonal synchrony, gross motor skills, fine motor skills, motor planning, imitation, movement variability, movement frequency, autism severity, IQ, children, developmental coordination disorder, social interaction
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Apraxias, Ataxia, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Skills, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Severity of Illness Index, Statistics as Topic, Task Performance and Analysis, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review