Cited by 2,044Action Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system

Open access
Iacoboni, Marco, Molnar-Szakacs, Istvan, Gallese, Vittorio, Buccino, Giovanni, Mazziotta, John C, Rizzolatti, Giacomo·2005·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Understanding the intentions of others while watching their actions is a fundamental building block of social behavior. The neural and functional mechanisms underlying this ability are still poorly understood. To investigate these mechanisms we used functional magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty-three subjects watched three kinds of stimuli: grasping hand actions without a context, context only (scenes containing objects), and grasping hand actions performed in two different contexts. In the latter condition the context suggested the intention associated with the grasping action (either drinking or cleaning). Actions embedded in contexts, compared with the other two conditions, yielded a significant signal increase in the posterior part of the inferior frontal gyrus and the adjacent sector of the ventral premotor cortex where hand actions are represented. Thus, premotor mirror neuron areas-areas active during the execution and the observation of an action-previously thought to be involved only in action recognition are actually also involved in understanding the intentions of others. To ascribe an intention is to infer a forthcoming new goal, and this is an operation that the motor system does automatically.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The IFG (an inferior part of the PMC) is involved in identifying the goals of hand movements as opposed to action execution alone.

    “Two recent studies also identified the IFG (an inferior part of the PMC) as an area involved in identifying the goals of hand movements (e.g., during behaviors like drinking and cleaning) as opposed to action execution alone [Iacoboni et al., 2005; Molnar-Szakacs et al., 2005].”

    From Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis (2009) · cites this paper as Iacoboni et al., 2005

  • Similar goal-identifying brain regions have been documented in the IFG of the human brain.

    “Similar goal identifying brain regions have been documented in the IFG of the human brain [Iacoboni et al., 2005].”

    From Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis (2009) · cites this paper as Iacoboni et al., 2005

  • Bodily resonance can afford a unique, first-person understanding of the experiences of others and is central to a number of social processes including intention understanding, empathy, and emotion recognition.

    “Evidence now suggests that this bodily resonance (see Glossary) can afford us a unique, first-person understanding of the experiences of others and is central to a number of social processes [7] including intention understanding [19], empathy [20], and emotion recognition [21].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Iacoboni, Marco
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2005-02-22
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
e79
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2042526117
Cited by
2,044
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 134 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 134 · 2012: 123
FWCI
153.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0107077)
  • Ahmanson Foundation
  • Brain Mapping Support Foundation
  • European Commission
  • European Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH63680)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR08655, P41RR013642, RR12169, RR 13642, C06RR012169)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
intention understanding, mirror neuron system, action observation, grasping, ventral premotor cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, social cognition, action context, goal inference, motor system
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Empathy, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Motor Neurons, Nerve Net, Neurons, Reference Values, Video Recording, Hand Strength, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review