The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research in Organizational Behavior
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social cognitive theory of organizational management
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258173 · Cited by 3,357
Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation
Ibarra, H. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667055 · Cited by 2,702
An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers.
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65 · Cited by 2,154
Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research
Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310385943 · Cited by 2,135
The Challenge of Innovation Implementation
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259164 · Cited by 2,113
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatman, J. A., & Kray, L. J.
- Venue
- Research in Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 100134
- ISSN
- 0191-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3214604381
- Cited by
- 4,059
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research in Organizational Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.riob.2021.100134
- The paper
- Chatman, J. A., & Kray, L. J. (2020). Research in Organizational Behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2021.100134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
