CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 263Academic integrity and plagiarismAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingAcademic Writing and Publishing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing

Casal, J. Elliott, Kessler, Matt·2023·Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
DOI 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100068
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100068

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Marino, F., Liska, D., & Kessler, M. (In press). Ethical considerations for research involving computer-assisted language learning, social media, and online environments. In P. I. De Costa, A. Rabie-Ahmed, & C. Cinaglia (Eds.), Ethical issues in applied linguistics scholarship. John Benjamins.
  2. Spilioti, 2017, Ethics of online research methods in applied linguistics, Applied Linguistics Review, 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 263

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Casal, J. E., & Kessler, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Casal, J. Elliott
ORCID
Venue
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
100068
ISSN
2772-7661 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100068
OpenAlex
W4385628481
Semantic Scholar
678298191a35694083bd01d4fac2f9a229dab98b
Cited by
261
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 12
FWCI
65.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, AI-generated text detection, peer review, journal editors, research ethics, scholarly publishing, artificial intelligence in research, applied linguistics journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review