The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation: A qualitative study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the experiences of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients invited to join a pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme. PR has been shown to be an effective non-pharmacological intervention; however uptake and completion of programmes is frequently low. DESIGN Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS Twenty COPD patients aged 45-85 years, referred for PR over a 2-year period. RESULTS In this group of patients the influence of the referring doctor was the key factor in leading patients to take up an invitation to attend a PR programme. Patients responded positively to doctors who imparted enthusiasm for, and belief in, the benefits of the intervention. Once started, ongoing adherence to the programme was positively influenced by a sense of group support, and increased self-confidence. Lack of social support at home and overcoming the effort of living with COPD in order to attend were cited as negative influences on continued adherence. CONCLUSIONS This study has shown that the referring doctor plays a key role in the uptake of PR programmes. It suggests that a positive approach by doctors could increase the level of adherence to PR. Recognition and support in the area of social support for those living alone may also increase adherence. These simple, cost effective approaches may encourage more patients with COPD to participate in a therapeutic intervention which now has a strong evidence base.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews
Boeije, H. (2002) · Quality and Quantity · doi:10.1023/a:1020909529486 · Cited by 3,073
Risk of depression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its determinants
van Manen, J. G. (2002) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.57.5.412 · Cited by 449
Cited by
Spruit, M. A., Singh, S. J., Garvey, C., ZuWallack, R., Nici, L., Rochester, C., Hill, K., Holland, A. E., Lareau, S. C., Man, W. D.-C., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201309-1634st · Cited by 3,938
British Thoracic Society guideline on pulmonary rehabilitation in adults: accredited by NICE
Bolton, C. E., Bevan-Smith, E. F., Blakey, J. D., Crowe, P., Elkin, S. L., Garrod, R., Greening, N. J., Heslop, K., Hull, J. H., Man, W. D.-C., et al. (2013) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203808 · Cited by 717
Keating, A., Lee, A., & Holland, A. E. (2011) · Chronic Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1177/1479972310393756 · Cited by 583
Denehy, L., Skinner, E. H., Edbrooke, L., Haines, K., Warrillow, S., Hawthorne, G., Gough, K., Hoorn, S. V., Morris, M. E., & Berney, S. (2013) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc12835 · Cited by 444
Cox, N. S., Oliveira, C. C., Lahham, A., & Holland, A. E. (2017) · Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2017.02.002 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnold, E., Bruton, A., & Ellis-Hill, C.
- Venue
- Respiratory Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1716-1723
- ISSN
- 0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967234350
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation: A qualitative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rmed.2006.02.007
- The paper
- Arnold, E., Bruton, A., & Ellis-Hill, C. (2006). Adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation: A qualitative study. Respiratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2006.02.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.